Neurofibrillary and Ethico-legal Tangles: In Search of Surrogates for Dementia Patients Lacking Decision-making Capacity and Relatives

Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 756-763

  Chin, Jing Jih ^a   Sahadevan, S ^a  

^a TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Beneficence; Cognitive disorders; Legislation; Mental competency; Patient care team

Indexed keywords

AGED; CASE REPORT; COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; LAW; MALE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEUROFIBRILLARY TANGLE; NURSING HOME; RELATIVE; REVIEW; SINGAPORE; SOCIAL WELFARE;

EID: 1042302804     PISSN: 03044602     EISSN: 29724066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Kua E H. The prevalence of dementia in elderly Chinese. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991; 83:350-2.
2. Kua E H, Ko S M. Prevalence of dementia among elderly Chinese and Malay residents of Singapore. Int Psychogeriatr 1995; 7:439-46.
3. Fellows L K. Competency and consent in dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46:922-6.
4. Herr S S, Hopkins B L. Healthcare decision-making for persons with disabilities. An alternative to guardianship. JAMA 1994; 271:1017-22.
5. Roberts L W, Geppert C M, Bailey R. Ethics in psychiatric practice: essential ethics skills, informed consent, the therapeutic relationship and confidentiality. J Psychiatric Prac 2002; 8:290-305.
6. Government of Singapore. The Statutes of the Republic of Singapore. Mental Disorders and Treatment Act (Chapter 178). Revised ed. Singapore: Singapore National Printers, 1985.
7. Emanuel E J, Emanuel L L. Proxy decision-making for incompetent patients. An ethical and empirical analysis. JAMA 1992; 267:2067-71.
8. Arnold R M, Kellum J. Moral justifications for surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:S347-S353.
9. Puchalski C M, Zhong Z, Jacobs M M, Fox E, Lynn J, Harrold J, et al. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48:S84-S90.
10. Government of Singapore. The Statutes of the Republic of Singapore. Destitute Person's Act (Chapter 78). Revised ed. Singapore: Singapore National Printers, 1990.
11. Miller T E, Coleman C H, Cugliari A M. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45:369-74.
12. Luttrell S. Making decisions about medical treatment for mentally incapable adults in the UK. Lancet 1997; 350:950-3.
13. Government of Singapore. The Statutes of the Republic of Singapore. Advance Medical Directive Act (Chapter 4A). Revised ed. Singapore: Singapore National Printers, 1997.
14. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioural Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington DC: US Government Private Office, 1983:32-3.
15. Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford Univ Press, 1994.
16. Mitchell S L, Lawson F M. Decision-making for long-term tube-feeding in cognitively impaired elderly people. CMAJ 1999; 160:1705-9.
17. Dresser R S. Autonomy revisited: the limits of anticipatory choice. In: Binstock P H, Post S G, Whitehouse P J, editors. Dementia and Aging: Ethics, Values and Policy Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
18. New South Wales Guardianship Act 1987 No 257. Available at: http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/fullhtml/inforce/act+257+1987+ FIRST+0+N#cd. Accessed 9 October 2003.
19. Pearlman R A. Challenges facing physicians and healthcare institutions caring for patients with mental incapacity. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44:994-6.
20. American Geriatrics Society Ethics Committee. Making treatment decisions for incapacitated older adults without advance directives. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44:986-7.
21. Sundram C J. Informed consent for major medical treatment of mentally disabled people. A new approach. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:1368-73.
22. Teno J M, Lynn J. Putting advance-care planning into action. J Clin Ethics 1996; 7:205-13.
23. Forbes S, Bern-Klug M, Gessert C. End-of-life decision-making for nursing home residents with dementia. J Nurs Scholarsh 2000; 32: 251-8.
24. Volicer L, Cantor M D, Derse A R, Edwards D M, Prudhomme A M, Gregory D C, et al. Advance care planning by proxy for residents of long-term care facilities who lack decision-making capacity. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50:761-7.
25. In re F v West Berkshire Health Authority (1989) 2 WLR 1025: (1989) All ER 673.
26. Republic of Singapore Ministry of Health Professional circular No 2/90. MH 71:02 Vol 8, Para 2. Singapore: Ministry of Health, 1990.
27. Moody H R. Ethics in an Aging Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
28. Meier D E. Voiceless and vulnerable: dementia patients without surrogates in an era of capitation. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45:375-7.