Improving workers' productivity and reducing Internet abuse

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 74-78

  Sharma, Sushil K ^a   Gupta, Jatinder N D ^b  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION MEDIA; CYBER SLACKING; INTERNET ABUSE;

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; CYBERNETICS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC MAIL; PERSONNEL; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INTERNET;

EID: 1042300810     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams III, H., S.M. Scheuing, and S.A. Feeley. "E-mail Monitoring in the Workplace: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," Defense Counsel Journal, 67:1, 2000, pp. 32-46.
2. Anonymous. "E-business or Bust: The Impact of the Internet/Net Effects," Sales and Marketing Management, 15:2, 2000, pp. 63-65.
3. Anonymous. "Internet Abuse is on the Increase," Management Services, 45:6, 2001, p. 3.
4. Belleflamme, P. "Ogliopolistic Competition, IT Use for Product Differentiation and the Productivity Paradox," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19:1, 2, 2001, pp. 227-248.
5. Cook, B. "Paradoxically Speaking: Increased IT Spending the Lack of Productivity Improvements," Inform, 13:5, 1999, p. 40.
6. Daniel, E.S. "Computers and Aggregate Economic Growth: An Update," Business Economics, 34:2, 1999, pp. 18-24.
7. Diewert, W.E. and K.J. Fox. "Can Measurement Error Explain the Productivity Paradox?" Canadian Journal of Economics, 32:2, 1999, pp. 281-289.
8. Edward, N.W. "The Productivity Paradox: Evidence from Indirect Indicators of Service Sector Productivity Growth," Canadian Journal of Economics, 32:2, 1999, pp. 289-308.
9. Ferris, N. "Cleaning up Your E-mail," Government Executive, 32:6, 2000, pp. 95-96.
10. Kudlow, L. "Greenspan, Through the Looking Glass," New York Times, March 10, 2000, p. A.21.
11. Lehr, B. and F. Lichtenberg. "Information Technology and Its Impact on Productivity: Firm-level Evidence from Government and Private Data Sources 1977-1993," Canadian Journal of Economics, 32:2, 2000, pp. 335-362.
12. Marsan, C.D. "Employee Study Cites Rampant Internet Abuse," Network World, 17:17, 2000, p. 38
13. McCarthy, M.L. "E-mail, Voice-mail and the Internet: How Employers can Avoid Getting Cut by the Double-edged Sworn of Technology," Business Credit, 101:9, 1999, pp. 44-45.
14. Merlino, L. "Employers Laid Back Over Internet Abuse," Upside, 12:5, 2000, p. 46.
15. Michelle, C. "Workers, Surf at your own Risk," Business Week, 3685, June 12, 2000, pp. 105-106.
16. Schwartz, P. "Long Live the Long Boom," Wired, September 1999.
17. Silva, D. "Companies Take Steps to Combat Internet Abuse," Puget Sound Business Journal, Seattle, 22:23, 2001, pp. 5-7.
18. Stratopoulos, T. and B. Dehning. "Does Successful Investment in Information Technology Solve the Productivity Paradox?" Information & Management, 38:2, 2000, pp. 103-117.
19. Sullivan, K.B. "Web Monitoring and Filtering Programs Promote Productivity," PC-Week, 13:50, 1996, pp. 21-22.
20. nd Half of '99," New York Times, February 9, 2000.
21. Woodall, P. "Survey: The New Economy: Solving the Paradox," The Economist, 35:8189, 2000, pp. 11-19.
22. Zelnick, N. "The Productivity Paradox," Internet-World, 5:39, 1999, p. 100.
23. Websense.com.
24. IDC Research, Source: http://www.websense.com/management/adl.cfm.
25. IDC Research, Source: http://www.websense.com/management/99/071599/cfm.