Nominal thermodynamic temperature in nonequilibrium kinetic ising models

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 26, 2003, Pages

  Sastre, Francisco ^a,b   Dornic, Ivan ^b   Chaté, Hugues ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUANAJUATO   (Mexico)

^b SERVICE DE PHYSIQUE DE L ETAT CONDENSÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ENTROPY; KINETIC THEORY; MAGNETIC RELAXATION; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PROBABILITY;

KINETIC ISING MODELS; THERMODYNAMIC TEMPERATURE;

THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 1042300652     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.267205     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. L.F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 173 (1993); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.173
2. L.F. CugliandoloJ. KurchanJ. Phys. AJPHAC5 27, 5749 (1994).10.1088/0305-4470/27/17/011
3. L.F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 55, 3898 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevE.55.3898
4. For a recent review, see A. Crisanti and F. Ritort, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 36, R181 (2003).
5. T.S. Grigera and N.E. Israeloff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5038 (1999); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5038
6. D. Hérisson and M. Ocio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257202 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257202
7. G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3660 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3660
8. J.-L. Barrat and W. Kob, Europhys. Lett. 46, 637 (1999).
9. A. Barrat et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5034 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5034
10. L. Berthier, J.-L. Barrat, and J. Kurchan, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 61, 5464 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.5464
11. L. Berthier and J.-L. Barrat, J. Chem. Phys.JCPSA6 116, 6228 (2002).10.1063/1.1460862
12. C. Godrèche and J.-M. Luck, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 33, 1151 (2000).10.1088/0305-4470/33/6/305
13. C. Godrèche and J.-M. Luck, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 33, 9141 (2000).10.1088/0305-4470/33/50/302
14. I. Dornic et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 045701 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.045701
15. Our method can certainly be applied to other kinds of kinetic Ising models involving, e.g., one temperature for spin flips and another one for spin exchanges, as in J.S. Wang and J.L. Lebowitz, J. Stat. Phys. 51, 893 (1988).
16. M.J. de Oliveira, J.F.F. Mendes, and M.A. Santos, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 26, 2317 (1993).10.1088/0305-4470/26/10/006
17. J.-M. Drouffe and C. Godrèche, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 32, 249 (1999).
18. G. Grinstein, C. Jayaprakash, and Y. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2527 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2527
19. K.E. Bassler and B. Schmittmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3343 (1994); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3343
20. U.C. Täuber, V.K. Akkineni, and J.E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 045702 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.045702
21. J.F.F. Mendes and M.A. Santos, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 57, 108 (1998); 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.108
22. T. Tomé and M.J. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 58, 4242 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4242
23. E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957).10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
24. A. Hüller and M. Pleimling, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 947 (2002).10.1142/S0129183102003693
25. F. Sastre, I. Dornic, and H. Chaté (to be published).
26. In our continuous-time setting, the response function of the magnetization is estimated as (Formula presented), where, at all the random times (if any) (Formula presented) where the spin (Formula presented) is updated, (Formula presented) is incremented by (Formula presented) if (Formula presented) flips, and by (Formula presented) if not [generalizing 4 at nonequal times]. For details, see C. Chatelain, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 36, 10739 (2003);
27. F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 (to be published), cond-mat/0307565.
28. P. Mayer et al, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 68, 016116 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016116
29. P. Calabrese and A. Gambassi, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE8 65, 066120 (2002); 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.066120
30. P. CalabreseA. GambassiPhys. Rev. EPLEEE866, 066101 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevE.66.066101
31. A. Gambassi (private communication).