Alternative separation of exchange and correlation in density-functional theory

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 24, 2003, Pages

  Armiento, R ^a   Mattsson, A E ^b  

^a ALBANOVA UNIVERSITY CENTER   (Sweden)

^b SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; SCREENING;

EID: 1042299856     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245120     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964);
2. Phys. Rev. W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, 140, A1133 (1964).
3. x were thoroughly discussed in Ref. 3,
4. R. Armiento and A.E. Mattsson, Phys. Rev. B 66, 165117 (2002).
5. G. Aissing and H.J. Monkhorst, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 27, 81 (1993);
6. H.J. Monkhorst, Phys. Rev. B 20, 1504 (1979).
7. A. Seidl, A. Görling, P. Vogl, J.A. Majewski, and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. B 53, 3764 (1996);
8. T. Leininger, H. Stoll, H. Werner, and A. Savin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 275, 151 (1997);
9. J. Heyd, G.E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003).
10. 2 are integer. Details on this parameter are found in Ref. 3.
11. Y → 0 in the end result. Clarifications are found in Ref. 10.
12. E.K.U. Gross and R.M. Dreizler, Z. Phys. A 302, 103 (1981).
13. L. J. Sham, Computational Methods in Band Structure (Plenum Press, New York, 1971), p. 458;
14. P.R. Antoniewicz and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6779 (1985);
15. Phys. Rev. B L. Kleinman and S. Lee, 37, 4634 (1988).
16. J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Mathematics Applied to Science (Academic Press, Boston, 1988), pp. 187–209.
17. J.P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13 244 (1992);
18. Phys. Rev. B J.P. Perdew and A. Zunger, 23, 5048 (1981);
19. S.H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980).
20. M. Gell-Mann and K.A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 106, 364 (1957).
21. G.G. Hoffman, Phys. Rev. B 45, 8730 (1992).
22. 1 = 0.093 840 6 (a.u.).
23. D.M. Ceperley and B.J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980).
24. 2 coefficient of YLDA2 is 0. 00151 (a.u.), which is closer to the exact value than PW (Ref. 11).
25. S. Kurth, J.P. Perdew, and P. Blaha, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 75, 889 (1999).
26. For the Si calculations we used the software SOCORRO, developed at Sandia National Laboratories. Norm-conserving Don Hamann LDA pseudopotential was used;
27. D.R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2980 (1989).