Public participation in environmental decisions: Stakeholders, authorities and procedural justice

International Journal of Global Environmental Issues

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 133-148

  Maguire, Lynn A ^a,c   Allan Lind, E ^{b,d,e,f,g,h,i}  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION   (United States)

^f RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^g Federal Judicial Center   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental conflict resolution; Negotiated rule making; Procedural justice; Stakeholder participation; Tar Pamlico River; Water quality planning

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; STAKEHOLDER; WATER QUALITY;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1042290262     PISSN: 14666650     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJGENVI.2003.003861     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Harter, P.J. (1982) 'Negotiating regulations: a cure for malaise', Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp.31-42.
2. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
3. Tyler, T.R. and Lind, E.A. (1992) 'A relational model of authority in groups', in M. Zanna (Ed.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, pp.115-192, Academic Press, New York.
4. Leventhal, G.S. (1980) 'What should be done with equity theory?', in Gergen, R., Greenberg, M. and Weiss, R. (Eds.): Social Exchange Theory: Advances in Theory and Research, pp.27-55, Plenum Press, New York.
5. Laver, M. (1981) The Politics of Private Desires, Penguin, New York.
6. Lind, E.A., Kulik, C., Ambrose, M. and Park, M. (1993) 'Individual and corporate dispute resolution: using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp.224-251.
7. Lind, E.A., MacCoun, R.J., Ebener, P.E., Felstiner, W.L.F., Hensler, D.R., Resnik, J. and Tyler, T.R. (1990) 'In the eye of the beholder: tort litigants' evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system', Law & Society Review, Vol. 24, pp.953-996.
8. Scientific Software Development (1997) 'ATLAS/ti®, The Knowledge Workbench. Visual Qualitative Data. Analysis, Management, Model Building', Berlin.
9. Lind, E.A. (2001) 'Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations', in Greenberg, J. and Cropanzano, R. (Eds.): Advances in Organizational Justice, pp.56-88, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
10. Wondolleck, J.M. and Ryan, C.M. (1999) 'What hat do l wear now?: An examination of agency roles in collaborative processes' Negotiation Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.117-133.
11. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H.A.M. and Lind, E.A. (1998) 'When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 75, pp.1449-1458.