An upwind compact approach with group velocity control for compressible flow fields

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 463-482

  Zhu, Qingyong ^a,b   Li, Yi ^b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Compressible flow fields; Group velocity control; Non physical oscillations; Shock capture technique; TVB property; Upwind compact finite difference method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; VELOCITY CONTROL;

UPWIND COMPACT OPERATORS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

COMPRESSIBLE FLUID; FINITE DIFFERENCE TECHNIQUE; FLOW FIELD; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; VELOCITY;

EID: 1042290077     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.647     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dexun Fu, Yanwen Ma. High resolution schemes. In Computational Fluid Dynamics Review, Hefez M, Oshima K (eds). Wiley: Chichester, 1995; 234-250.
2. Leonard BP. A stable and accurate convective modeling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1979; 19:59-98.
3. Rai MM, Moin P. Direct simulation of turbulent flow using finite difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1991; 96(1):15-53.
4. Dexun Fu, Yanwen Ma. A high order accurate finite difference scheme for complex flow fields. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 134:1-15.
5. Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103:16-42.
6. Weinan E, Jian-Guo Liu. Essentially compact schemes for unsteady viscous incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 126(1):122-138.
7. Qingyong Zhu, Yanwen Ma. A high order accurate upwind compact finite difference scheme with group velocity control for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 15(5): 531-536.
8. Peter C Chu, Chenwu Fan. A three-point combined compact difference scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 140(2):370-399.
9. Yabe T, Xiao F, Utsumi T. The constrained interpolation profile method for multiphase analysis. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 169(2):556-593.
10. Dexun Fu, Yanwen Ma. Non-physical oscillations in numerical solutions-reason and improvement. Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal 1995; 4(4):427-450.
11. Swanson RC. On central-difference and upwind schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 101: 292-306.
12. Steger JL, Warming RF. Flux vector splitting of the in viscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite difference methods. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 40:263-293.
13. Fay JA, Riddell RF. Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air. Journal of Aeronautical Sciences 1958; 25:73-85.
14. Shih PK, Gay A. Low L/D aerobrake heat transfer test at Mach 10. AIAA Paper, 1984; 984-309.
15. Yamamoto Y. Numerical simulation of hypersonic viscous fore- and after-body flows over capsule-type vehicles at angles of attack. AIAA Paper, 1985; 85-0924.