Improving Science Teaching for All Students

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 97, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 377-387

  Arámbula Greenfield, Teresa ^a   Feldman, Arnold ^a  

^a University of Hawaii Cooperative Extension Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1042282515     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17379.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 3–27.
2. Barba, R., & Cardinale, L. (1991). Are females invisible students? An investigation of teacher-student questioning interactions. School Science & Mathematics, 91(7). 306–310.
3. Bazler, J. A., & Simonis, D. A. (1991). Are high school chemistry textbooks gender fair Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 353–362.
4. Bianchini, J. (1993, April). The high school biology textbook: A changing mosaic of gender, science, and purpose. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
5. Biraimah, K. (1989, February). Inequalities in classroom computer software. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Savannah, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 951).
6. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
7. Brush, S. G. (1991). Women in science and engineering. American Scientist, 79, 404–419.
8. Burstyn, J. N. (1993). Who benefits and who suffers: Gender and education at the dawn of the age of information technology. In S. K. Biklen & D. Pollard (Eds.), Gender and education: 92nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 107–125). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Byrne, E. M. (1993). Women and science: The snark syndrome. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
10. Campbell, P. B. (1992a). Nothing can stop us now: Designing effective programs for girls in math, science, and engineering. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. 385.
11. Campbell, P. B. (1992b). Working together, making changes: Working in and out of school to encourage girls in math and science. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
12. Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67, 199–215.
13. Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243–257.
14. Cavallaro, C. C., Stowitschek, C. E., George, M., & Stowitschek, J. J. (1980). Intensive inservice teacher education and concomitant changes in handicapped learners. Teacher Education and Special Education, 3, 49–57.
15. Delamont, S. (1990). Sex roles and the school (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
16. Duschl, R. A. (1983). The elementary level science methods course: Breeding ground of an apprehension toward science? A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 745–754.
17. Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice elementary teacher education students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 205–222.
18. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1994). Looking in classrooms. New York: HarperCollins.
19. Grandy, J. (1994). Gender and ethnic differences among science and engineering majors; experiences, achievements, and expectations (GRE Board Research Report No. 92–03R; ETS Research Report 94–30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
20. Greenfield, T. A. (1995). Sex differences in science museum exhibit attraction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 925–938.
21. Greenfield, T.A. (1997). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education 81, 259–276.
22. Guzzetti, B. J., & Williams, W. O. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 5–20.
23. Hindman, S. E., & Polgrove, L. (1988). Differential effects of feedback on preservice teacher behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 25–29.
24. Horn, L. (1990, April). Trends in high school math and science course taking: Effects of gender and ethnicity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 593).
25. Humrich, E. (1988, April). Sex differences in the Second IEA Science Study—U.S. results in an international context. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake of the Ozarks, MO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 292 649).
26. Jones, L. R., Mullis, I. V. S., Raisen, S. A., Weiss, I. R., & Weston, E. A. (1992). The 1990 science report card: NAEP's assessment of fourth, eighth, and twelfth graders. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
27. Jones, M. G., & Wheatley, J. (1990). Gender differences in teacher-student interactions in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, 861–874.
28. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1983). Power in staff development through research on training. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29. Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131–140.
30. Kotte, D. (1992). Gender differences in science achievement in 10 countries: 1970/71 to 1983/84. New York: Peter Lang.
31. Lapointe, A., Mead, N., & Phillips, G. (1989). A world of differences: An international assessment of mathematics and science. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
32. Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26, 254–263.
33. Mason, C. L., & Kahle, J. B. (1988). Student attitudes toward science and science-related careers: a program designed to promote a stimulating gender- free learning environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 25–29.
34. Matyas, M. (1984, April). Science career interests, attitudes, abilities, and anxiety among secondary school students: The effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and school type/location. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 251 309).
35. Measor, L., & Sikes, P. J. (1992). Gender and schools. NY: Cassell.
36. Miyako, M. (1989). Science achievement of elementary and secondary school students in Japan (NIER Occasional Paper 01/89). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 317 379).
37. Mullis, I. V. S., Dossey, J. A., Foertsch, M. A., Jones, L. R., & Gentile, C. A. (1991). Trends in academic progress: Achievement of U.S. students in science, 1969–70 to 1990; mathematics, 1973 to 1990; reading, 1971 to 1990; writing, 1984 to 1990. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
38. National Center for Education Statistics. (1995). Findings from the Condition of Education 1995, No. 5: The educational progress of women (NCES 96–768). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
39. National Science Board. (1993). Science and engineering indicators: 1993. (NSB93–1). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40. Orenstein, P. (1994). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
41. Padilla, M. J. (1991). Science activities, process skills, and thinking. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds), The psychology of learning science (pp. 205–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Pederson, J. E., & McCurdy, D. W. (1992). The effects of hands-on, minds-on teaching experiences on attitudes of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 76, 141–146.
43. Riddell, S.I. (1992). Gender and the politics of the curriculum. New York: Routledge.
44. Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female friendly science: Applying women's studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon Press.
45. Rosser, S. V. (1993). Female friendly science: Including women in curricular content and pedagogy in science. Journal of General Education, 42, 191–220.
46. Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D. J., & Nichols, S. E. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist-constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897–924.
47. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
48. Shaw, E. L., & Doan, R. L. (1990). Attitudes and achievement between male and female second and fifth grade science students. Mid-South Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting for 1990, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 326 442.
49. Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69, 511–526.
50. Simpson, R. D., & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences on commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 66, 763–781.
51. Steinkamp, M., & Maehr, M. (1984). Gender differences in motivational orientations towards achievement in school science: A quantitative synthesis. American Education Research Journal, 21, 39–59.
52. Stohr-Hunt, P. M. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 101–109.
53. Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74, 421–431.
54. Tyson, H. (1994). Who will teach the children? Progress and resistance in teacher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
55. Vetter, B. (1994). The next generation of scientists and engineers: Who's in the pipeline? In W. Pearson, Jr., & A. Fechter (Eds.), Who will do science? Educating the next generation (pp. 1–19). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
56. Wang, J., & Staver, J. R. (1995, April). An empirical study about China: Gender equity in science education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
57. Whyte, J. (1984). Observing sex stereotypes and interactions in the school lab and workshop. Educational Review, 32, 75–86.