The AP1000 reactor - The nuclear renaissance option

Nuclear Energy

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-45

  Matzie, R A ^a   Worrall, A ^b  

^a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY   (United States)

^b SELLAFIELD LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Commercial opportunities competitiveness; International collaboration; Plant design construction; Reactor

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPETITION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DESIGN; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

COST COMPETITIVE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; PLANT DESIGN;

PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS;

EID: 1042277587     PISSN: 01404067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/nuen.43.1.33.36387     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document. vol. III, ALWR Passive Plant, Revision 7, 12/95.
2. European Utility Requirements for LWR Nuclear Power Plants. vol. 3, EPP Subset, Revision A, 12/99.
3. Summary of Findings from the British Energy and BNFL Collaboration on AP1000.
4. AP1000 Probabilistic Risk Assessment. March 2002, Revision 0.
5. AP1000 Design Control Document. May 2002, Revision 2.