Choice of Coordination Number in d10 Complexes of Group 11 Metals

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1465-1477

  Carvajal, M Angels ^a   Novoa, Juan J ^a   Alvarez, Santiago ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; DEFORMATION; IONS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

DEFORMATION ENERGY; METAL COMPLEXES;

COPPER;

AMMONIA; BROMIDE; CHLORIDE; COPPER; GOLD; METAL COMPLEX; SILVER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; DIMERIZATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; GEOMETRY; SOLID STATE;

EID: 1042276603     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja038416a     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gimeno, M. C.; Laguna. A. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 511.
2. Vogt, J.; Mez-Starck, B.; Vogt, N.; Hutter, W. J. Mol. Struct. 1999. 485-486, 249.
3. Harris, H.; Fisher, K.; Dance, I. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 6972.
4. Schwerdtfeger, P.; Hermann, H. L.; Schmidbaur. H. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 1334.
5. Kanatzidis, M. G.; Jun-Hong, C. J. Solid State Chem. 1996, 127, 186.
6. Bowmaker, G. A.; Schmidbaur, H.; Krüger, S.; Rösch, N. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 1754.
7. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T. A.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.; Baker, J. P.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 94, revision E. 1; Gaussian, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
8. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
9. Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299.
10. Huzinaga, S.; Andzelm, J.; Klobukowski, M.; Radzi-Andzelm, E.; Sakai, Y. ; Tatewaki, H. Gaussian Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations: Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1984; polarization functions.
11. Boys, S. F.; Bernardi, F. Mol. Phys. 1970, 19, 553.
12. van Wüllen, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 5485.
13. Adamo, C.; Barone, V. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 330, 152.
14. Cosi, M.; Barone, V. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1995.
15. Fox, B. S.; Beyer, M. K. Bondybey, V. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13613.
16. Schmiedekamp, A. M.; Ryan, M. D.; Deeth, R. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 41, 5733.
17. Hancock, R. D.; Martell. A. E. Comments Inorg. Chem. 1988. 6, 237.
18. If the order in which these two energy contributions are calculated is inverted, the resulting values are different, but the bending energy is always seen to be more important than the stretching one. Thus, in the rest of this paper, we adopt the convention of calculating always bending energies at the bond distances of the lower coordination number and the stretching energies at the bond angles of the higher coordination number.
19. Liu, X.-Y.; Mota, F.; Alemany, P.; Novoa, J. J.; Alvarez, S. Chem. Commum. 1998, 1149.
20. Zank, J.; Schier, A.; Schmidbaur, H. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 415.
21. Dieleman, C. B.; Matt, D.; Harriman, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 831.
22. Camalli, M.; Caruso, F. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1990, 169, 189.
23. Bayler, A.; Schier, A.; Bowmaker, G. A.; Schmidbaur, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7006.
24. Tripathi, U. M.; Bauer, A.; Schmidbaur, H. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1997, 2865.
25. Palacios, A. A.; Aullón, G.; Alemany, P.; Alvarez, S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3166.
26. 2 = 0,999 for 66 data sets.
27. Viotte, M.; Gautheron, B.; Kubicki, M. M.; Mugnier, Y.; Parish, R. V. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 3465.
28. Boldyrev, A. I.; Gutowski, M.; Simons, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 497.
29. Bowmaker, G. A.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H.; Healy, P. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1988, 2825.
30. Bowmaker, G. A.; Wang, J.; Hart, R. D.; White, A. H.; Healy, P. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1992, 787.
31. Tulloch, A. A. D.; Danopoulos, A. A.; Winston, S.; Kleinhenz, S.; Eastham, G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 4499.
32. Cramer, R. E.; Maynard, R. B.; Evangelista, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984. 106, 111.
33. Archibong, E.; Adeyemo, A.; Aoki, K.; Yamazaki, H. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1989, 156, 77.
34. 2 = 0,999 for 126 ligand association reactions.
35. Bowmaker, G. A.; Camus, A.; Healy, P. C.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 3883.
36. Bayler, A.; Schier, A.; Schmidbaur, H. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4353.
37. Affandi, A.; Berners-Price, S. J.; Effendy; Harvey, P. J.; Healy, P. C.; Ruch, B. E.; White, A. H. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1997, 1411.
38. Camalli, M.; Caruso, F. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1987, 127, 209.
39. Jones, P. G.; Sheldrick, G. M.; Muir, J. A.; Muir, M. M.; Pulgar, L. B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 2123.
40. Griffith, J. S. The Theory of Transition-metal Ions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1971.
41. 2+ (9.1, 8.5, and 12.9 kcal/mol for Zn, Cd, and Hg, respectively), and these differences can be blamed responsible for the distribution of coordination numbers among the divalent ions of these metals, since dicoordination is the most common one for Hg but the less common one for Zn and Cd. according to our structural database searches.