Family Planning in the Balance

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-18

  Hwang, Ann C ^a   Stewart, Felicia H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; COST CONTROL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PLANNING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; POLITICS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TECHNIQUE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1042268200     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.94.1.15     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Programme of Action. Cairo, Egypt: International Conference on Population and Development; 1994. Principle 8.
2. Proclamation of Tehran. Tehran, Iran: International Conference on Human Rights; 1968.
3. US Agency for International Development. Saving women's lives, protecting women's health [fact sheet]. Available at: http://www.usaid.gov/pop_health/pop/popfpfactsheet.htm. Accessed June 28, 2001.
4. Adamson DM, Belden N, DaVanzo J, Patterson S. How Americans View World Population Issues: A Survey of Public Opinion. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND; 2000.
5. Memorandum of March 28, 2001 - restoration of the Mexico City Policy. Federal Register. March 29, 2001: 17301-17313.
6. Brown WA, Glick BL, Tong TG. Report of the China UN Population Fund (UNFPA) Independent Assessment Team. Available at: http://www.state. gov/g/prm/rls/rpt/2002/12122.htm. Accessed January 11, 2003.
7. Boucher R. FY 2002 funding for the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) [press statement]. Available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2002/12035.htm. Accessed November 25, 2002.
8. Boucher R. Daily press briefing: November 7, 2002. Available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2002/14994.htm. Accessed November 21, 2002.
9. Dao J. Over U.S. protest, Asian group approves family planning goals. New York Times. December 18, 2002:A7.
10. An anti-life crusade [editorial]. New York Times. December 20, 2002:A38.
11. Dailard C. Abstinence promotion and teen family planning: the misguided drive for equal funding. Guttmacher Rep. February 2002:1-3.
12. U.S. diverts funds withdrawn from UN over China abortion row. Agence France Presse. January 22, 2003.
13. Meeting the Goals of the ICPD: Consequences of Resource Shortfalls Up to the Year 2000. New York, NY: United Nations Population Fund; 1997.
14. Alan Guttmacher Institute, Population Reference Bureau, Futures Group International, Population Action International. Potential impact of increased family planning funding on the lives of women and their families overseas [special report]. Available at: http://www. agi-usa.org/pubs/fund_impact.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2003.
15. Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York, NY: United Nations Development Program; 2002.
16. Marie Stopes International. Africa's poorest will suffer as USA's Mexico City Policy forces family planning clinics to close [press release]. Available at: http://www.mariestopes.org.uk/ww/ press/press-ww-100901.htm. Accessed November 25, 2002.
17. Camp S. The impact of the Mexico City Policy on women and health care in developing countries. N Y University J Int Law Politics. 1987;20:35-51.
18. Blane J, Friedman M. Mexico City Policy Implementation Study. Washington, DC: Agency for International Development; 1990. Population Technical Assistance Project occasional paper 5.
19. Mexico City Policy: Effects of Restrictions on International Family Planning Funding, July 19, 2001: Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 107th Cong, 1st Sess (2001) (testimony of Susana Galdos Silva).
20. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions With Annotations, 2000-2001 Edition. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 2000:231.
21. McCafferty C, Leigh E, Lamb N. China mission report by UK MP's: 1st April-9th April 2002. Available at: http://www.house.gov/maloney/issues/UNFPA/ukreport.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2003.
22. Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, US Dept of State. Analysis of determination that Kemp-Kasten Amendment precludes further funding to UNFPA under Pub. L. 107-115. Available at: http://www.state.gov/g/prm/rls/other/12128.htm. Accessed November 25, 2002.
23. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Secretary Thompson announces expanded coordination of HIV/ AIDS programs in China [press release]. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/20020628b.html. Accessed January 11, 2003.
24. Korby D. Emerging Answers: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy; 2001.
25. US Social Security Act §510(b)(2) (1996). Available at http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title05/0510.htm. Accessed December 17, 2003.
26. Kempner M. Toward a Sexually Healthy America: Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs That Try to Keep Our Youth 'Scared Chaste.' New York, NY: Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States; 2001.
27. Choosing the Best Student Manual, 1998 Edition. Marietta, Ga: Choosing the Best Inc; 1998.
28. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Primary and secondary syphilis-United States, 2000-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:971-973.
29. Clue2000 Curriculum. New York, NY: Pure Love Alliance; 2000.
30. United Nations Population Fund. Family planning: a human right [fact sheet]. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/rh/planning.htm. Accessed June 25, 2003.