Screening of mulberry (Morus spp.) for salinity tolerance through in vitro seed germination

Indian Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 47-51

  Vijayan, K ^b   Chakraborti, S P ^a   Ghosh, P D ^c  

^a Ctrl Sericultural Res Train Inst   (India)

^b Central Silk Board   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KALYANI   (India)

Author keywords

Morus spp; Mulberry; Salinity; Seed germination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROP; ENGLISH BLACK; GENOTYPE; GERMINATION; IN VITRO STUDY; KOLITHA 3; KPG 3; MULBERRY; MYSORE LOCAL; NONHUMAN; PLANT SEED; ROTUNDILOBA; SALINITY; SALT TOLERANCE; SOIL; SULTANPUR;

MORUS (PLANT);

EID: 1042268159     PISSN: 09725849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Greenway H & Munns R, Mechanism of salt tolerance in non-halophytes, Ann Rev Plant Physiol, 31 (1980) 149-190
2. Bandhyopadhyaya A K, Varieties tolerant of coastal acid saline soils, Int Rice Res News Lett, 12 (1987) 21.
3. Chakraborti S P et al, Mulberry cultivation in coastal saline soil of West Bengal, Indian Silk, 38 (1999) 5-7.
4. Chakraborti S P et al, Evaluation of mulberry varieties for costal saline soils of West Bengal, Bull Indian Acad Seri, 4 (2000) 41-45.
5. Ghosal S S & Bajaj Y P S, Isolation of sodium chloride resistant cell lines in some grain legumes, Indian J Exp Biol, 22 (1984) 209-214.
6. Murashige T & Skoog F, A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures, Physiol Plant, 15 (1962) 473-497.
7. Abel G H & Mackenize A J, Salt tolerance of soyabean varieties during germination and later growth, Crop Sci, 4 (1964) 157-161.
8. Levitt J, Response of plants to environmental stresses, in Water, radiartion salt and other stresses (Academic Press, New York) 1980, 365-488.
9. Yadav R et al, The involvement of transpirational by pass flow in sodium uptake by high-and low-sodium transporting lines of rice developed through inter-variety selections, Plant Cell Environ, 19 (1996) 329-336.
10. Bernstein L & Hayward H E, Physiology of salt tolerance, Ann Rev Physiol, 9 (1958) 25-46.
11. Ungar I A, Halophytic seed germination, Bot Rev, 44 (1978) 233-264.
12. Chandra S, in Proc Int Workshop on Chick pea Improvement, (edited by J M Green et al) 1980, 97-105.
13. Bliss R D et al, Osmotic sensitivity in relation to salt sensitivity in germinating barley seeds, Plant Cell Environ, 9 (1986) 721-725.
14. Esashi Y & Leopold A C, Physical forces in dormancy and seed germination of Xanthium seeds, Plant Physiol, 43 (1968) 871-876.
15. Hegarty T W, The physioloy of seed hydration and dehydration between water stress and the control of seed germination: A review, Plant Cell Environ, 1 (1978) 101-119.
16. Jones R A, High salt tolerance potential in Lycopersicon species during germination, Euphytica, 35 (1986) 575-582.
17. Scot S J & Jones R A, Low temperature seed germination of Lycopersicon species evaluated by survival analysis, Euphytica, 31 (1982) 869-883.
18. Jones M P & Stenhouse J W, Salt tolerance of mangrove swamp rice varieties, Int Rice Res Newslett, 8 (1983) 8-9.
19. Chaudhury M A et al, Induced variability for salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) after N-methyl-N-nitroson urea treatment of fertilized egg cells, Environ Exp Bot, 27 (1987) 29-35.
20. Jana M K & Slinkard A E, Screening for salt tolerance in lentil, LENS, 6 (1976) 25-27.
21. Jaiwal PK et al, Int Chickpea Newslett, 9 (1983) 15-16.