Degrees-of-freedom tests for smoothing splines

Biometrika

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 251-263

  Cantoni, Eva ^a   Hastie, Trevor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Additive model; Degrees of freedom test; Smoothing parameter selection; Smoothing spline

Indexed keywords

EID: 1042263216     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/89.2.251     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AZZALINI, A. & BOWMAN, A. (1993). On the use of nonparametric regression for checking linear relationships. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 55, 549-57.
2. BAI, Z., DEMMEL, J., DONGARRA, J., RUHE, A. & VAN DER VORST, H. (2000). Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide. Philadelphia: SIAM.
3. CHAMBERS, J. M. & HASTIE, T. J. (Ed.) (1991). Statistical Models in S. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4. CHATTERJEE, S., HANDCOCK, M. S. & SIMONOFF, J. S. (1995). A Casebook for a First Course in Statistics and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.
5. 2 random variables. Appl. Statist. 29, 323-33.
6. EILERS, P. H. C. & MARX, B. D. (1992). Generalized linear models with P-splines. In Advances in GLIM and Statistical Modelling. Proceedings of the GLIM92 Conference, Ed. L. Fahrmeir et al., pp. 72-7. New York: Springer.
7. FAREBROTHER, R. W. (1990). [Algorithm AS 256] The distribution of a quadratic form in normal variables. Appl. Statist. 39, 294-309.
8. GRAY, R. J. (1994). Spline-based tests in survival analysis. Biometrics 50, 640-52.
9. GREEN, P. J. & SILVERMAN, B. W. (1994). Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach. London: Chapman and Hall.
10. HASTIE, T. (1996). Pseudosplines. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 58, 379-96.
11. HASTIE, T. J. & TIBSHIRANI, R. J. (1990). Generalized Additive Models. London: Chapman and Hall.
12. HENDERSON, C. R. (1950). Estimation of genetic parameters (abstract). Ann. Math. Statist. 21, 309-10.
13. HENDERSON, C. R. (1973). Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honour of Dr. Jay. L. Lush, pp. 10-41. Champaign, IL: Am. Soc. Anim. Sci.-Am. Dairy Sci. Assoc.-Poultry Sci. Assoc.
14. JOHNSON, N. L. & KOTZ, S. (1970). Continuous Univariate Distributions, 2. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
15. LIN, X. & ZHANG, D. (1999). Inference in generalized additive mixed models. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 61, 381-400.
16. ROBINSON, G. K. (1991). That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects (with Discussion). Statist. Sci. 6, 15-51.
17. SIMONOFF, J. S. (1996). Smoothing Methods in Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. SOCKETT, E. B., DANEMAN, D., CLARSON, C. & EHRICH, R. M. (1987). Factors affecting and patterns of residual insulin secretion during the first year of type I (insulin dependent) diabetes millitus in children. Diabetologia 30, 453-9.
19. SPEED, T. (1991). Comment on That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects'. Statist. Sci. 6, 42-4.
20. WAHBA, G. (1990). Spline Models for Observational Data. Philadelphia: SIAM.
21. WECKER, W. E. & ANSLEY, C. F. (1983). The signal extraction approach to nonlinear regression and spline smoothing. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 78, 81-9.