Bibliographic instructional design: A case study

Community and Junior College Libraries

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 17-37

  Johnson, Wendell G ^a   Burke, Adam ^a   Evans, Barbara ^a  

^a Waubonsee College   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliographic instruction; Instructional design; Library instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 10344266665     PISSN: 02763915     EISSN: 15452522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J107v10n03_04     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Lucy Holman, “A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Classroom Bibliographic Instruction,” Reference & User Services quarterly 40 (fall 2000): pp. 53-60 describes a study of first-year English students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2. Diane Nahl Jakobovitz and Leon A Jakobovitz, “Bibliographic Instructional Design for Information Literacy: Integrating affective and Cognitive objectives” Research Strategies 11 (spring 1993): 73-85.
3. Diane Nahl Jakobovitz and Leon A Jakobovitz, “Bibliographic Instructional Design for Information Literacy: Integrating affective and Cognitive objectives” American Libraries. 32 (May 2001): 10.
4. Valerie Jackson Feinman, “Library Instruction: What is our classroom?” Computer in Libraries 14 (Feb 1994): 33-36.
5. Deborah J. Grimes and Carl H. Boening, “Worries with the web,” College and Research Libraries 62 (2001): 11-23 describe and discuss ten web evaluation criteria.
6. Cornell University, “The Seven Steps of the Research Process,” 27 April 2001 .
7. Deborah J. Grimes and Carl H. Boening, The Seven Steps of the Research Process p. 21 found that students often evaluate web re-sources only superficially. Students are not taught to apply the same critiques to web sources as to print sources.
8. Elaina Norlin, “Reference Evaluation: A Three-Step Approach–Surveys, Unobtrusive Observations, and Focus Groups,” College and Research Libraries 61 (2000): 546-553 The University of Arizona evaluated their reference service over the course of three semesters.