Clinical use of digital retrospective image fusion of CT, MRI, FDG-PET and SPECT - Fields of indications and results;Klinischer einsatz der digitalen retrospektiven bildfusion von CT, MRT, FDG-PET und SPECT - Anwendungsgebiete und ergebnisse

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1811-1818

  Lemke, Arne Jörn ^a   Niehues, S M ^a   Amthauer, H ^a   Rohlfing, T ^b   Hosten, N ^c   Felix, R ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

CT; Differential diagnosis; MRI; PET; Retrospective image fusion; SPECT

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITALIZATION; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEPATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIASTINUM; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREATOGRAPHY; PARAMETER; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 10344250420     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813663     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Feig BW. Retroperitoneal sarcomas. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2003; 12: 369-377
2. Follen M, Levenback CF, Iyer RB et al. Imaging in cervical cancer. Cancer 2003; 98: 2028-2038
3. Tsai CC, Tsai CS, Ng KK et al. The impact of image fusion in resolving discrepant findings between FDG-PET and MRI/CT in patients with gynaecological cancers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 1674-1683
4. Weber WA, Avril N, Schwaiger M. Relevance of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 1999; 175: 356-373
5. Pfannenberg AC, Oechsle K, Kollmannsberger C et al. [18F]FDG-PET, CT/MRT und Tumormarker als prädiktive Indikatoren für das Ansprechen unter Hochdosis-Chemotherapie bei Patienten mit metastasierten Keimzelltumoren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 76-84
6. Goerres GW, Schmid DT, Bandhauer F et al. Positron emission tomography in the early follow-up of advanced head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 105-109
7. Gutzeit A, Debatin JF, Antoch G. Tumorstaging mit der PET/CT: Detektion eines Zweittumors. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 122-124
8. Popperl G, Lang S, Dagdelen O et al. Korrelation von FDG-PET und MRT/CT mit der Histopathologie in Primärdiagnostik, Lymphknotenstaging und Rezidivdiagnostik von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 714-720
9. Maurer CR Jr, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY et al. Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 447-462
10. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA et al. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 810-816
11. Forster GJ, Laumann C, Nickel O et al. SPET/CT image co-registration in the abdomen with a simple and cost-effective tool. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 32-39
12. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ et al. FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: do anatometabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localisation of regional lymph node metastases? The Leuven Lung Cancer Group. Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25: 1495-1501
13. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M et al. Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46: R1-45
14. Rohlfing T, West JB, Beier J et al. Registration of functional and anatomical MRI: Accuracy assessment and application in navigated neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 2000; 5: 414-425
15. Ell PJ, von Schulthess GK. PET/CT: a new road map. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29: 719-720
16. Jager PL, Slart RH, Corstens FH et al. PET-CT: a matter of opinion? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 470-471
17. Antoch G, Stattaus J, Nemat AT et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. Radiology 2003; 229: 526-533
18. Chajari M, Lacroix J, Peny AM et al. Gallium-67 scintigraphy in lymphoma: is there a benefit of image fusion with computed tomography? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29: 380-387
19. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2500-2507
20. Vogel WV, Oyen WJ, Barentsz JO et al. PET/CT: panacea, redundancy, or something in between? J Nucl Med 2004; 45 (Suppl 1): 15S-24S
21. Caldwell CB, Mah K, Ung YC et al. Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT: the impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51: 923-931
22. Nakamoto Y, Tatsumi M, Cohade C et al. Accuracy of image fusion of normal upper abdominal organs visualized with PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 597-602
23. Klabbers BM, de Munck JC, Slotman BJ et al. Matching PET and CT scans of the head and neck area: development of method and validation. Med Phys 2002; 29: 2230-2238
24. Sweeney RA, Bale RJ, Moncayo R et al. Multimodality cranial image fusion using external markers applied via a vacuum mouthpiece and a case report. Strahlenther Onkol 2003; 179: 254-260
25. Mongioj V, Brusa A, Loi G et al. Accuracy evaluation of fusion of Cr, MR, and spect images using commercially available software packages (SRS PLATO and IFS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43: 227-234
26. Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Schuster A et al. Clinical applications of registration and fusion of multimodality brain images from PET, SPECT, CT, and MRI. Eur J Radiol 1996; 21: 174-182
27. Julow J, Major T, Emri M et al. The application of image fusion in stereotactic brachytherapy of brain tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142: 1253-1258
28. Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS et al. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. Jama 2003; 290: 3199-3206
29. Schaffler GJ, Groell R, Schoellnast H et al. Digital image fusion of CT and PET data sets - clinical value in abdominal/pelvic malignancies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 644-647
30. Kretschmer L, Altenvoerde G, Meller J et al. Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and image fusion of SPECT and pelvic CT-scans allow mapping of aberrant pelvic sentinel lymph nodes in malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 175-183
31. Martinelli M, Townsend D, Meltzer C et al. 7. Survey of Results of Whole Body Imaging Using the PET/CT at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PET Facility. Clin Positron Imaging 2000; 3: 161
32. Hosten N, Kreissig R, Puls R et al. Fusion von CT- und PET-Daten: Methode und klinische Bedeutung am Beispiel der Planung der laserin-duzierten Thermotherapie von Lebermetastasen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 630-635
33. Pfannenberg AC, Eschmann SM, Horger M et al. Benefit of anatomical-functional image fusion in the diagnostic work-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 835-843
34. Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 1200-1209
35. Rohlfing T, Maurer CR Jr, O'Dell WG et al. Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based non-rigid registration of gated MR images. Med Phys 2004; 31: 427-432