Achieving consensus across diverse stakeholders on quality measures for mental healthcare

Medical Care

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1246-1253

  Hermann, Richard C ^a,b,c   Palmer, Heather ^c   Leff, Stephen ^d   Shwartz, Michael ^e   Provost, Scott ^a,b   Chan, Jeffrey ^a,b   Chiu, Wai T ^b   Lagodmos, Greta ^b  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Ctr Qual Assess Improvement M   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d Human Services Research Institute   (United States)

^e BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consensus development; Measure; Mental health; Quality

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MENTAL HEALTH; PROPHYLAXIS; REVIEW; SAFETY;

EID: 10344248967     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00012     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Institute of Medicine. Leadership by Example: Coordinating Government Roles in Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.
2. US Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon General. Report of the Surgeon General's Conference on Children's Mental Health: A National Action Agenda. Washington, DC: US Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon General; 2001.
3. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2001. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001. ISBN-92 4 1562013.
4. President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. Quality First: Better Health Care for All Americans Final report of the president's advisory commission on consumer protection and quality in the health care industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1998.
5. Institute of Medicine. Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
6. Forum on Performance Measures in Behavioral Healthcare and Related Systems. Adult Mental Health Workgroup (AMHW). Available at: http://www.mhindicators.org/amhw.asp. Accessed September 13, 2004.
7. MHSIP Task Force. The Final Report of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Task Force on a Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card. Washington, DC: Center for Mental Health Services; April 1996.
8. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Project (MHSIP). Decision Support 2000+. Available at: http://www.mhsip.org/ds2000/newindex.htm. Accessed September 13, 2004.
9. Schacht LM, Hines H. Recent applications of risk adjustment for performance measures used by state inpatient psychiatric facilities. Harvard Rev Psychiatiy. 2003;11:220-224.
10. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) 2000. Washington, DC: NCQA; 2000. Volume 1.
11. Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS). CMHS Core Performance Indicator Chart. Community Mental Health Services Block Grant Application Guidance. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004.
12. McCorry F, Garnick DW, Bartlett J, et al. Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Joint Commission J Quality Improvement. 2000;26:633-643.
13. Hermann RC, Leff HS, Palmer RH, et al. Quality measures for mental health care: results from a national inventory. Medical Care Res Rev. 2000;57(Suppl 2):135-154.
14. Hermann R, Leff S, Provost S, et al. Process measures for quality assessment and improvement: are they based on research evidence? Paper presented at: NIMH Conference on Evidence in Mental Health Services Research: What Types, How Much and What Then? Available at http://www.cqaimh.org/research.html, 2002; Washington, DC.
15. Hermann RC, Finnerty M, Provost S, et al. Process measures for the assessment and improvement of quality of care for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2002;28:95-104.
16. Hermann RC. Quality Measurement for Improving Mental Healthcare: A Guide With Results from a National Inventory of Measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; in press.
17. Hermann RC, Palmer RH. Common ground: a framework for selecting core quality measures. Psychiatric Services. 2002;53:281-287.
18. Schuster M, Asch S, McGlynn E, et al. Development of a quality of care measurement system for children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:1085-1092.
19. Asch S, Kerr E, Lapuerta P, et al. A new approach for measuring quality of care for women with hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1329-1335.
20. Normand S, McNeil B, Peterson L, et al. Eliciting expert opinion using the Delphi technique: identifying performance indicators for cardiovascular disease. Int J Quality Health Care. 1998;10:247-260.
21. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
22. Brook R. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. RAND/RP-395.
23. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
24. American Managed Behavioral Healthcare Association. PERMS 2.0. Performance Measures for Managed Behavioral Healthcare Programs. Washington, DC: AMBHA; July 1998.
25. Young A, Sullivan G, Burnam A, Brook R. Measuring the quality of outpatient treatment for schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:611-617.
26. Lehman AF, Steinwachs DM. Patterns of usual care for schizophrenia: initial results from the schizophrenia patient outcomes research team (PORT) client survey. Schizophrenia Bull. 1998;24:11-20.
27. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. Performance measures for mental health systems: a standardized framework, Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; December 4, 1998.
28. New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services. IPMES/Workscope Objective Attainment System: FY2000 and 2000 2001. Albany, NY: New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services; July 2000.
29. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Health Plan Data and Information Set (HEDIS 2000). Washington. DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance: 1999.
30. Veterans Health Administration/Department of Defense. VHA/DOD Performance Measures for the Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults, Version 2. 0. Washington, DC: March 2000.
31. APA Task Force on Quality Indicators for Children. Workbook of Quality Indicators for Children. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; August 21, 2000.
32. Zimmerman DR, Karon SL, Arling G, et al. Development and testing of nursing home quality indicators. Health Care Financing Rev. 1995:16:107-127.
33. Marcus S, Olfson M, Pincus H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mood stabilizers in Medicaid patients with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1014-1018.
34. Wells K, Norquist G, Benjamin B, et al. Quality of antidepressant medications prescribed at discharge to depressed elderly patients in general medical hospitals before and after prospective payment system. Gen Hospital Psychiatry. 1994;16:4-15.
35. American Psychiatric Association. Report of the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Quality Indicators. Washington, DC: APA: March 1999.
36. New York State Office of Mental Health. Report of the Performance Measurement/Management Workgroup Project. Albany, NY: New York State Office of Mental Health; November 18, 1998.
37. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. National Library of Healthcare Indicators. Oakbrook Terrace, IL; 1997
38. Washington Circle Group. Improving Performance Measurement by Managed Care Plans for Substance Abuse: Year 1 Report of the Washington Circle Group. Rockville, MD: Washington Circle Group; March 16, 1999.
39. American Psychiatric Association Office of Quality Improvement. APA Practice Guideline Measures. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2001.
40. McCorry F, Garnick DW, Bartlett J, Cotter F, Chalk M. Improving Performance Measurement for Alcohol and Other Drug Services: Report of the Washington Circle Group. Rockville, MD: Washington Circle Group and the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; March 2000.
41. Leslie D, Rosenheck R. Comparing quality of mental health care for public-sector and privately insured populations. Psychiatric Services. 2000;51:650-655.
42. Rosenheck R, DiLella D. Department of Veterans Affairs National Mental Health Program Performance Monitoring System: Fiscal Year 1999 Report. West Haven, CT: Northeast Program Evaluation Center: March 14, 2000.
43. Center for Mental Health Services. The Final Report of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Project (MHSIP) Task Force on a Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services; 1996.
44. Massachusetts Division of Medical Assistance. FY'99 Performance Standards. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership; 1999.
45. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care: Volume 1. Detection and Diagnosis. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1993.
46. Hermann RC. Risk Adjustment for Mental Health Care. In: Iezzoni LI, ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Third ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2003.
47. Hermann RC. Linking outcome measurement with process measurement for quality improvement. In: IsHak W Burt T, Sederer L, eds. Outcome Measurement in Psychiatry: A Critical Review. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.; 2002.