Computer-aided segmentation, form analysis and classification of 2975 breast microcalcifications using 7-fold microfocus magnification mammography;Computerassistierte segmentierung und formanalyse von 2975 mammären mikroverkalkungen mit hilfe der 7fachen vergrößerungsprä parateradiographie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1759-1765

  Grunert, Jens Holger ^a,b   Khalifa, R ^a   Gmelin, E ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast calcifications; Breast diseases; Breast radiography; Computer assisted diagnosis; Microfocus radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; CANCER RISK; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITALIZATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; MORPHOMETRICS; PARAMETER; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 10344241993     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813651     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman JR et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Lancet 1995; 345: 1154-1157
2. Breimann L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA et al. Classification and regression trees. California: Belmont, 1984
3. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998; 18: 110-121
4. de Lafontan B, Daures JP, Salicru B et al. Isolated clustered microcalcifications: diagnostic value of mammography-series of 400 cases with surgical verification. Radiology 1994; 190: 479-483
5. Lanyi M. Formanalyse von 136 Mikroverkalkungsgruppen benigner Genese. Wie spezifisch ist das "Dreieckprinzip"? Fortschr Röntgenstr 1982; 136: 182-188
6. Lanyi M. Formanalyse von 5641 Mikroverkalkungen bei 100 Milchgangskarzinomen: Die Polymorphie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1983; 139: 240-248
7. Lanyi M, Citoler P. Differentialdiagnostik der Mikroverkalkungen: Die kleinzystische (blunt duct) Adenose. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1981; 134: 225-231
8. De Roos MA, Pijnappel RM, Post WJ et al. Correlation between imaging and pathology in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. World J Surg Oncol 2004; 2: 4
9. Sickles EA. Breast Calcifications: Mammographic Evaluation. Radiology 1986; 160: 289-293
10. Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K et al. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 1993; 187: 81-87
11. Monostori Z, Herman PG, Carmody DP et al. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 173: 438-442
12. Teubner J, Lenk JZ, Wentz KU et al. Vergrößerungsmammographie mit 0.1 mm Mikrofokus. Vergleich von Raster- und Vergrößerungstechnik bei Zielaufnahmen. Radiologe 1987; 27: 155-164
13. Grunert JH, Borchert B, Kuske M et al. Mikrokalknachweis in Mammabiopsiezylindern: DIMA-Präparateradiographie 7fach im Vergleich zum histopathologischen Befund. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 170: 347-350
14. Grunert JH, Flemming P, Borchert B et al. Vergröß erungspräparateradiographie als Qualitätskontrolle der Mikrokalkerfassung im Rahmen der histopathologischen Aufarbeitung von Mammabiopsiegewebe. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 172: 68-72
15. Grunert JH, Barbey M, Berndt G et al. DIMA enlargement mammography in microcalcifications: a prospective study with ROC analysis. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 284-291
16. Bocchi L, Coppini G, Nori J et al. Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks. Med Eng Phys 2004; 26: 303-312
17. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Bollow M et al. Evaluation of a wavelet-based computer-assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full-field mammography. Acta Radiol 2004; 45: 136-141
18. Leichter I, Lederman R, Buchbinder SS et al. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 705-712
19. Nakayama R, Uchiyama Y, Watanabe R et al. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms. Med Phys 2004; 31: 789-799
20. Sittek H, Herrmann K, Perlet C et al. Computerunterstutzte Auswertung von Mammographien. Erste klinische Erfahrungen. Radiologe 1997; 37: 610-616
21. Betal D, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 903-917
22. Wu YC, Freedman MT, Hasegawa A et al. Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathologic specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad Radiol 1995; 2: 199-204
23. Parker J, Dance DR, Davies DH et al. Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammograms. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 150-159
24. Albertyn LE. Mammographically indeterminate microcalcifications - can we do any better? Australas Radiol 1991; 35: 350-357