The effects of organizational sampling frame selection

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 237-252

  Murphy, Gregory B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; Research; Sample; Source

Indexed keywords

EID: 10344231506     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00061-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aldrich, H., Kalleberg, A., Marsden, P., Cassell, J., 1989. In pursuit of evidence: sampling procedures for locating new businesses. J Bus Venturing 4 (6), 367-386.
2. Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17 (1), 99-120.
3. Birley, S., 1984. Finding the new firm. Acad Manage Proc 47, 64-68.
4. Birley, S., 1986. The role of new firms: births, deaths, and job generation. Strategic Manage J 7 (4), 361-376.
5. Busenitz, L.W., Murphy, G.B., 1996. New evidence in the pursuit of locating new businesses. J Bus Venturing 11 (3), 221-231.
6. Chandler, G.N., Jansen, E., 1992. The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance. J Bus Venturing 7 (3), 223-236.
7. Chen, M.J., Smith, K.G., 1987. Samples used in strategic management research. Acad Manage Proc 50, 7-11.
8. Cooper, A.C., Gimeno-Gascon, J.G., 1992. Entrepreneurs, processes of founding, and new-firm performance. In: Sexton, D.L., Kasarda, J.D. (Eds.), The state of the art of entrepreneurship. PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston, MA.
9. Dillman, D.A., 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
10. Herron, L., 1990. The Effects of Characteristics of the Entrepreneur on New Venture Performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
11. Herron, L., Robinson, R.B., 1993. A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance. J Bus Venturing 8 (3), 281-294.
12. Kalleberg, A.L., Marsden, P.V., Aldrich, H.E., Cassell, J.W., 1990. Comparing organizational sampling frames. Adm Sci Q 35 (4), 658-688.
13. Kennedy, P., 1992. A guide to econometrics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Kunkel, S.W., 1991. The Impact of Strategy and Industry Structure on New Venture Performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
15. McCarthy, A.M., 1992. The Role of Strategy, Environment, Resources, and Strategic Change in New Venture Performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
16. McDougall, P.P., 1987. An Analysis of Strategy, Entry Barriers, and Origin as Factors Explaining New Venture Performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
17. Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. Porter, M.E., 1980. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York.
19. Porter, L.W., Smith, F.J., 1970. The etiology of organizational commitment. Unpublished paper, University of California at Irvine.
20. Sandberg, W.R., 1986. New venture performance: the role of strategy and industry structure. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
21. Tushman, M.L., Anderson, P., 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31 (3), 439-465.
22. Williams, M.L., 1993. Measuring business starts, success and survival: some database considerations. J Bus Venturing 8 (4), 295-299.
23. Zahra, S.A., 1993. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: a taxonomic approach. J Bus Venturing 8 (4), 319-340.