The cultivation of student self-efficacy in reading and writing

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 173-187

  Walker, Barbara J ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244279797     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573560308217     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Almasi, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourt.li graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
2. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann.
3. Bandura, A (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
4. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here? Comtemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 102-114.
5. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Troia, G. A. (1998). Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 20-41). New York: The Guilford Press.
6. Guthrie, J. T., & McCann, A D. (1997). Characteristics of classrooms that promote motivations and strategies for learning, lit J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 128-148). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
8. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158.
9. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Brown, R. (1998). Transational instruction of comprehension strategies in the elementary grades. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 42-56). New York: The Guilford Press.
10. Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (1997). The role of responsive teacher in focusing reader intention and developing reader motivation. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 102-125). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
12. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1993). Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self- efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. Journal of Special Education, 27, 257-276.
13. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New' York: Guilford Press.
14. Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on student achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321-351.
15. Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410-441.
16. Turner, J. C. (1997). Starting right: Strategies for engaging young literacy learners. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), pp. 183-204, Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17. Walker, B. J. (1997). Discussions that focus on strategies and self-assessment. In L. B. Gam- brell & J. F. Almasi (Eds.), Lively discussions: Fostering engaged reading (pp. 183-204). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18. Walker, B. J. (2000). Diagnostic teaching of reading: Techniques for instruction and assessment. 4th ed. Englew'ood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Wigfield, A. (1998). Children's motivations for reading and reading engagement. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 14-33). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
20. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Pyschology, 82, 51-59.