The semantic smart laboratory: A system for supporting the chemical eScientist

Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry

Volumn 2, Issue 22, 2004, Pages 3284-3293

  Hughes, Gareth ^a   Mills, Hugo ^a   De Roure, David ^a   Frey, Jeremy G ^a   Moreau, Luc ^a   Schraefel, M C ^a   Smith, Graham ^a   Zaluska, Ed ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); METADATA; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

BACK-END STORAGE SYSTEMS; DIGITAL LAB BOOK; HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGN; LAB BOOK SOFTWARE;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 10244234180     PISSN: 14770520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b410075a     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. J. Frey, D. De Roure, m. c. schraefel, H. Mills, H. Fu, S. Peppe, O. Hughes, G. Smith, and T. R. Payne, Context Slicing the Chemical Aether, Proceedings of First International Workshop on Hypermedia and the Semantic Web, ed. M. David, University of Southampton EPrints Service Southampton, UK, 2003.
2. J. G. Frey, D. De Roure and L. Carr, Publication at Source: Scientific Communication from a Publication Web to a Data Grid, Proceedings of Euroweb 2002, British Computer Society, Swindon, 2002, pp. 88-90.
3. m. c. schraefel, G. Hughes, H. Mills, G. Smith and J. Frey, Making Tea: Iterative Design through Analogy, Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems, ACM Press, New York NY, 2002, pp. 49-58.
4. m. c. schraefel, G. Hughes, H. Mills, G. Smith, T. Payne and J. Frey, Breaking the Book: Translating the Chemistry Lab Book into a Pervasive Computing Lab Environment, Proceedings of CHI 2004, ACM Press, New York NY, pp. 25-32.
5. COSHH Essentials. UK Health and Safety Executive. http:// www.coshh-essentials.org.uk/.
6. Jena, A Semantic Web Framework for Java. http:// jena.sourceforge.net/.
7. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax, ed. G. Klyne and J. J. Carroll, W3C, Geneva, 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/.
8. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, ed. D. Brickley and R.V Guha, W3C, Geneva, 2004. http://www.w3.org/ TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/.
9. OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation, ed. P. F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes and I Horrocks, 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/.
10. AKT project reference ontology. http://www.aktors.org/publications/ ontology/.
11. R. Heery, M. Duke, M. Day, L. Lyon, S. Coles, J. Frey, M. Hursthouse, L. Carr, and C. Gutteridge, Integrating research data into the publication workflow: eBank experience, PV-2004: Ensuring the Long-Term Preservation and Adding Value to the Scientific and Technical Data, held 5-7 October 2004, Frascati, Italy.
12. Protégé Project. http://protege.stanford.edu/.
13. BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SAP AG and Siebel Systems, Business Process Execution Language for Web Services Version 1.1, May 2003. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ ws-bpel/.
14. DAML Services Coalition, OWL-S specification. http:// www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/.
15. SCRIP-SAFE, PatentPad. http://www.scrip-safe.com/laboratory_ notebook.htm/.
16. L. Arnstein, G. Borriello, S. Consolvo, C. Hung and J. Su, Labscape: A Smart Environment for the Cell Biology Laboratory, IEEE Pervas. Comput. Mag., 2002, 1(3), 13-21.
17. K. Bøegh, C. Letondal, W. E. Mackay, G. Pothier and H. E. Sørensen, The Missing Link: Augmenting Biology Laboratory Notebooks, Proc. UIST, ACM Press, New York NY, 2002, pp. 41-50.
18. J. D. Myers, Collaborative Electronic Notebooks as Electronic Records: Design Issues for the Secure Electronic Laboratory Notebook (ELN), Proc. CTS'03, Society for Modeling and Simulation (SCS), http://www.scs.org. Proceedings: http://www.scs.org/scsarchive/ search.cfm?presearch=db&dbrec=29. Paper: http://www.scs.org/ scsarchive/getDoc.cfm?id=2051. Metadata: http://www.scs.org/ scsarchive/docInfo.cfm?get=2051.
19. Amphora Research Ltd., http://www.amphora-research.com/.
20. ChemOffice, CambridgeSoft Corporation. http://www.camsoft.com/.
21. NoteBookMaker, NoteBookMaker ltd. http://www.notebook-maker.com/.
22. Open Biological Ontologies. http://obo.sourceforge.net/.
23. C. J. Stoeckert Jr, H. C. Causton and H. A. Ball, Microarray data-bases: standards and ontologies, Nat. Genet., 2002, 32, 469-473.
24. C. D. Hafner, N. Fridman Noy, Ontological Foundations for Biology Knowledge Models, 4th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, AAAI Press, St. Louis MO, 1996, 78-87.
25. L. Pouchard, L. Cinquini, B. Drach, et al., Exploring Ontologies in ESG, Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid 2003), IEEE Comp. Soc., Los Alamitos, pp. 626-632.
26. Chemical Markup Language project. http://cml.sourceforge.net/.
27. P. Murray-Rust and H. S. Rzepa, Chemical markup, XML and the Worldwide Web, Part 4: CML Schema, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2003, 43(4), 757-772.
28. C. M. Pancerella, J. D. Myers, et al., Metadata in the Collaboratory for Multi-Scale Chemical Science, Proceedings of the 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice-Metadata Research and Applications (DC 2003). Conference proceedings: http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/search.jsp. Paper: http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/401_Paper67.pdf.
29. J. D. Myers, A. Chappell, M. Elder, A. Geist and J. Schwidder, Re-integrating the research record, IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., 2003, 5(3), 44-50.