The influence of local contextual characteristics on the implementation of a statewide voter initiative: The case of California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (Proposition 36)

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 589-610

  Percival, Garrick L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIME;

EID: 10244232863     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00082.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. "The 'Gender Gap' in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle and Old Question." Political Research Quarterly 54: 143-60.
2. Bali, Valentina A. 2003. "Implementing Popular Initiatives: What Matters for Compliance"? Journal of Politics 65: 1130-46.
3. Beckett, Katherine. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Books, John W., and Charles L. Pysby. 1991. Political Behavior and the Local Context. New York: Praeger.
5. Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan. 1998. Demanding Choices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. Brace, Paul, Kellie Sims-Butler, Kevin Arceneaux, and Martin Johnson. 2002. "Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data." American Journal of Political Science 46: 173-86.
7. deLeon, Peter, and Linda deLeon. 2002. "What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12: 467-92.
8. Dye, Thomas R. 1966. Politics, Economics, and Public Policy: Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9. Dye, Thomas R. 1979. "Politics and Economics: The Development of the Literature on Policy Determination." Policy Studies Journal 7 (3): 652-62.
10. Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Feiock, Richard C., and Jonathan West. 1993. "Testing Competing Explanations for Local Policy Adoption: Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Programs." Political Research Quarterly 46 (2): 399-419.
12. Ford, William E., and Micky J. W. Smith. 2001. "Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000: Analysis of Plans from the 58 Counties." Report prepared by Health Systems Research Inc. for the Center for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Washington, D.C.
13. Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Gerber, Elisabeth R., Arthur Lupia, Matthew McCubbins, and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 2001. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Gerstein, D. R., R. A. Johnson, H. J. Harwood, D. Fountain, N. Suter, and K. Malloy. 1994. Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center; Fairfax, VA: Lewin.
16. Goggin, Malcolm, Ann M. Bowman, James P. Lester, and Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little Brown.
17. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Angela Hinton-Andersson. 1995. "Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Policy Linkages." American Journal of Political Science 39: 924-35.
18. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley. 1996. "Political Parties and Class Mobilization in Contemporary United States Elections." American Journal of Political Science 40: 787-804.
19. Jones, Bradford S., and Barbara Norrander. 1996. "The Reliability of Aggregated Public Opinion Measures." American Journal of Political Science 40: 295-309.
20. Lester, James P., and Patrick Keptner. 1984. "State Budgetary Commitments to Environmental Quality Under Austerity." In Western Public Lands, ed. John G. Francis and Richard Ganzel. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, Ch. 9, pp. 193-214.
21. Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Macallier, Daniel, Michael Males, Cheryl Rios, and Deborah Vargas. 2000. "Drug Use and Justice: An Examination of California Drug Enforcement Policy." Report prepared for Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, San Franciso, CA.
23. Males, Mike, Daniel Macallier, and Ross Jamison. 2002. "Drug Use and Justice 2002: An Examination of California Drug Policy Enforcement. Report prepared for Center of Juvenile and Criminal Justice.
24. Maxwell, Sheila R. 1999. "Conservative Sanctioning and Correctional Innovations in the United States: An Examination of Recent Trends." International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27: 401-12.
25. Mazmanian, Daniel, and Paul Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and Public Policy. Chicago: Scott Foresman.
26. Meier, Kenneth J. 1994. The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol and Public Policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
27. Mintrom, Michael. 2000. Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
28. O'Brien, Robert M. 1990. "Estimating the Reliability of Aggregate-Level Variables Based on Individual-Level Characteristics." Sociological Methods and Research 18: 473-504.
29. Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2002. "In Defense of Single-State Studies." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (4): 411-22.
30. Norrander, Barbara. 2001. "Measuring Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1: 111-25.
31. Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Riley, Jack K., Pat Ebener, James Chiesa, Susan Turner, and Jeanne Ringel. 2001. "Drug Offenders and the Criminal Justice System: Will Proposition 36 Treat or Create Problems?" San Francisco, CA: RAND Corp.
33. Rubin, Irene, and Harold Rubin. 1987. "Economic Development Incentives: The Poor (Cities) Pay More." Urban Affairs Quarterly 23: 39-57.
34. Scheberle, Denise. 1997. Federalism and Environmental Policy. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
35. Sharpe, Elaine. 1999. The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36. Thompson, Frank, and Michael J. Scicchitano. 1985. "State Implementation and Federal Enforcement Priorities." Administration and Society 19: 95-124.
37. Tonry, Michael. 1999. "Why Are U.S. Incarceration Rates So High?" Crime and Delinquency 45: 419-37.
38. Treadway, Jack M. 1985. Public Policymaking in the American States New York: Praeger.