Defining the standard of care in randomized controlled trials of titrated therapies

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 579-582

  Deans, Katherine J ^a,b,c   Minneci, Peter C ^a,b   Eichacker, Peter Q ^a   Natanson, Charles ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARDSNetwork; ARMA; Randomized controlled trials; Titrated therapies

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROL GROUP; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; STANDARDIZATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TIDAL VOLUME; TITRIMETRY;

EID: 10244232807     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000145097.36069.44     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1301-1308. This is the original report of the ARDS Network low tidal volume ventilation trial, which describes the trial design, results, and conclusions in detail.
2. Marshall E: Clinical trials: in critical condition. Science 2003, 300:1225-1226.
3. Drazen JM: Controlling research trials. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:1377-1380.
4. Steinbrook R: How best to ventilate? Trial design and patient safety in studies of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:1393-1401.
5. Eichacker PQ, Gerstenberger EP, Banks SM, et al.: Meta-analysis of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome trials testing low tidal volumes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 166:1510-1514. This meta-analysis raised specific concerns about the control group in the ARMA trial not representing current practice. It analyzed all the randomized controlled trials of low tidal volume ventilation and provided data to support the idea that patients in the control group of the ARMA trial may have been placed at increased risk.
6. Ferguson AD, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, et al.: Airway pressures, tidal volumes and mortality in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2004, in press.
7. Weinert CR, Gross CR, Marinelli WA: Impact of randomized trial results on acute lung injury ventilator therapy in teaching hospitals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167:1304-1309.
8. Eichacker PQ, Banks SM, Natanson C: Meta-analysis of tidal volumes in ARDS [letter]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167:798-800. This letter is an in-depth response to the ARDS Network criticisms [13asterisk inside a circle signasterisk inside a circle sign, 14asterisk inside a circle sign, 15asterisk inside a circle sign] of the meta-analysis of the low tidal volume trials performed by Eichacker et al. [5asterisk inside a circle signasterisk inside a circle sign]. It provides an analysis to support the existence of current practice for tidal volume selection in patients with ARDS.
9. Carmichael LC, Dorinsky PM, Higgins SB, et al.: Diagnosis and therapy of acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: an international survey. J Crit Care 1996, 11:9-18.
10. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, et al.: Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 2002, 287:345-355.
11. Slutsky AS: Mechanical ventilation. American College of Chest Physicians' Consensus Conference. Chest 1993, 104:1833-1859.
12. Parshuram C, Kavanagh B: Meta-analysis of tidal volumes in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167:798; author reply 798-800. This letter raises concerns about the lack of a current practice control arm in the ARDS Network low tidal volume trial.
13. Brower RG, Matthay M, Schoenfeld D: Meta-analysis of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 166:1515-1517. This letter outlines criticisms of the meta-analysis of Eichacker et al. [5asterisk inside a circle signasterisk inside a circle sign] from the ARDS Network investigators. It provides a detailed argument to support the lack of standard care in the ventilation of patients with ARDS.
14. Brower RG, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT: Meta-analysis of tidal volumes in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 168:255-256. This letter outlines further criticisms of the meta-analyses by Eichacker et al. [5asterisk inside a circle signasterisk inside a circle sign]. from the ARDS Network investigators.
15. Amato M, Brochard L, Stewart T, et al.: Metaanalysis of tidal volume in ARDS [letter]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 168:612-613. This letter outlines further criticisms of the meta-analyses by Eichacker et al. [5asterisk inside a circle signasterisk inside a circle sign]. from the ARDS Network investigators.
16. Wood KA, Huang D, Angus DC: Improving clinical trial design in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2003, 31 (4 Suppl):S305-S311. This article reviews issues involved with designing trials to study acute lung injury, including testing therapies against the current best methods of care.
17. Borror C, Carome MA: OHRP decision letter: human research subject protections under federalwide assurance (FWA) 3136, multiple project assurances (MPA) M-1331, M-1363, and M-1338 and the OHRP-approved assurances for all ARDS Network institutions. Office of Human Research Protections, 2003:1-15. Available at http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/detrm_letrs/YR03/jul03a.pdf. This letter outlines the outcome and recommendations of the investigations into the ARDS Network trials by the Office of Human Research Protections.
18. Miller FG, Silverman HJ: The ethical relevance of the standard of care in the design of clinical trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004, 169:562-564. This article provides an in-depth discussion of the ethical issues surrounding the standard of care in clinical trials, including a consideration of how they relate to the ARDS Network low tidal volume trial.
19. Silverman HJ, Miller FG: Control group selection in critical care randomized controlled trials evaluating interventional strategies: an ethical assessment. Crit Care Med 2004, 32:852-857. This article provides an in-depth discussion of the ethical issues surrounding control group selection in clinical trials, including a consideration of how they relate to the ARDS Network low tidal volume trial.