Vegetation patterns in a cut-away peatland in relation to abiotic and biotic factors: A case study from the Šumava Mts., Czech Republic

Suo

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 33-43

  Lanta, Vojtěch ^a   Doležal, Jiří ^a   Šamata, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Clonal plant; Cut away peat bog; Eriophorum angustifolium; Plant colonization

Indexed keywords

CLONAL GROWTH; COLONIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; PEATLAND; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

BRYOPHYTA; ERIOPHORUM; ERIOPHORUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM; ERIOPHORUM VAGINATUM; JUNCUS; JUNCUS EFFUSUS; MOLINIA; MOLINIA CAERULEA; SPHAGNUM; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 10244232796     PISSN: 00395471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aerts, R., Wallen, B. & Malmer, N. 1992. Growth-limiting nutrients in Sphagnum dominated bogs subject to low and high atmospheric nitrogen supply. Journal of Ecology 80: 131-140.
2. Anon. 1996. STATISTICA for Windows. Statsoft, Tulsa, OK.
3. Callaway, R.M. & Walker, L.R. 1997. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78: 1958-1965.
4. Callaway, R.M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. Botanical Review 61: 306-369.
5. Callaway, R.M., DeLucia, E.H., Moore, D., Nowak, R. & Schlesinger, W.H. 1996. Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs. montane pines. Ecology 77: 2130-2141.
6. Campbell, D.R., Rochefort, L. & Lavoie, C. 2003. Determining the immigration potential of plants colonizing disturbed environments: the case of milled peatlands in Québec. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 78-91.
7. Campeau, S. & Rochefort, L. 1996. Sphagnum regeneration on bare peat surfaces: field and greenhouse results. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 599-608.
8. Chambers, J.C. 2001. Pinus monophylla establishment in an expanding Pinus-Juniperus woodland: Environmental conditions, facilitation and interacting factors. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 27-40.
9. Desrochers, A., Rochefort, L. & Savard, J.-P.L. 1998. Avian recolozation of eastern Canadian bogs after peat mining. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 989-997.
10. Frilander, P., Leinonen, A. & Alakangas, E. 1996. Peat production technology. In: Vasander, H. (ed.) Peatlands in Finland. pp. 99-106. Finnish Peatland Society, Helsinki.
11. Girard, M., Lavoie, C. & Theriault, M. 2002. The regeneration of highly disturbed ecosystem: a mined peatland in Southern Québec. Ecosystems 5: 274-288.
12. Groeneveld, E.V.G. & Rochefort L. 2002. Nursing plants in peatland restoration: on their potential use to alleviate frost heaving problems. Suo 53: 73-85.
13. Haase, P. 2001. Can isotropy vs. anisotropy in the spatial association of plant species reveal physical vs. biotic facilitation? Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 127-136.
14. Horn, P. & Bastl, M. 2000. Successional changes of vegetation at the "Multerberské rašeliniště" peat bog in the Šumava Mts. during the last 50 years. Přiroda 17: 109-118.
15. Joosten, J.H.J. 1995. Time to regenerate: long-term perspectives of raised bog restoration with special emphasis on paleoecological studies. In: Wheeler, B.D., Shaw, S.C., Fojt, W.J. & Robertson, R.A. (eds.). Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. pp. 379-404. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
16. Kodym, O. 1961. Vysvětlivky k přehledné geologické mapě ĆSSR 1: 200 000. Ústř ední ústav geologický, Praha.
17. Kučera, J. & Vána, J. 2003. Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic 2003. Preslia 75: 193-222.
18. Kučerová, A., Rektoris, L. & Přibá ň, K. 2000. Vegetation changes of Pinus rotundata bog forest in the Žofinka" Nature Reserve, Třeboň Biosphere Reserve. Přiroda 17: 119-138.
19. Lappalainen, E. 1996. General review on world peatland and peat resources. In: Lappalainen, E. (ed.) Global peat resources, pp. 53-56. International Peat Society, Jyskä, Findland.
20. Lavoie, C., Grosvernier, P., Girard. M. & Marcoux K. 2003. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: An useful restoration tool? Wetlands ecology and Management 11: 97-107.
21. Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 192 pp.
22. Moravec, J., Blažková, D., Hejný, S., Husová , M., Jenik, J., Kolbek, J., Krahulec, F., Krečmer, V., Kropáč, Z., Neubhäusl, R., Neuhäuslová -Novotná, Z., Rybniček, K., Rybničková, E., Samek, V. & Štěpán, J. 1994. Fytocenologie. Academia, Praha. 403 pp.
23. Neuhäusl, R. 1972. Subkontinentale Hochmoore und ihre Vegetation. Studie ČSAV 1972/13: 1-21.
24. Økland, R.H., Økland, T. & Rydgren, K. 2001. A Scandiavian perspective on ecological gradients in north-west European mires: reply to Wheeler and Proctor. Journal of Ecology 89: 481-486.
25. Olsen, S.R. & Sommers, L.E. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. & Keeney, D.R. (eds.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. pp. 403-430. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.
26. Pfadenhauer, J. & Klötzli, F. 1996. Restoration experiments in middle European wet terrestrial ecosystems: an overview. Vegetatio 126: 101-115.
27. Price, J. 1997. Soil moisture, water tension, and water table relationships in a managed cutover bog. Journal of Hydrology 202: 21-32.
28. Price, J., Rochefort, L.& Quinty, F. 1998. Energy and moisture considerations on cutover peatlands: surface microtopography, mulch cover and Sphagnum regeneration. Ecological Engineering 10: 293-312.
29. Robert, E.C., Rochefort, L. & Garneau, M. 1999. Natural revegetation of two block-cut mined peatlands in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 447-459.
30. Rothmaler, W. 1976. Exkursionsflora für die Gebiete DDR und der BDR. Kritischer band. Volk und Wissen, Berlin. 753 pp.
31. Salonen, V. 1987. Relationship between the seed rain and the establishment of vegetation in two areas abandoned after peat harvesting. Holarctic Ecology 10: 171-174.
32. Schouwenaars, J.M. 1995. The selection of internal and external water management options for bog restoration. In: Wheeler, B.D., Shaw, S.C., Fojt, W.J. & Robertson, R.A. (eds.). Restoration of temperate wetlands. pp. 331-358. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
33. Sokal, R.R & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd edition, W.H. Freeman, New York, USA. 887 pp.
34. Stoneman, R. & Brooks, S. eds. 1997. Conserving Bogs: The Management Handbook. The Stationary office, Edinburgh. 286 pp.
35. Sundberg, S. & Rydin, H. 2002. Habitat requirements for establishment of Sphagnum from spores. Journal of Ecology 90: 268-278.
36. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. 1998. CANOCO reference manual. Centre of Biometry, Wageningen. 351 pp.
37. Tuittila, E.-S., Rita, H., Vasander, H. & Laine, J. 2000. Vegetation patterns around Eriophorum vaginatum L. tussocks in a cut-away peatland in southern Finland. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 47-58.
38. van der Maarel, E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97-114.
39. Wheeler, B.D. & Proctor, M.C.F. 2000. Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. Journal of Ecology 88: 187-203.
40. Wikberg, S. & Mucina, L. 2002. Spatial variation in vegetation and abiotic factors related to the occurrence of a ring-forming sedge. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 677-684.
41. Wind-Mulder, H.L., Rochefort, L. & Vitt, D.H. 1996. Water and peat chemistry comparisons of natural and post-harvested peatlands across Canada and their relevance to peatland restoration. Ecological Engineering 7: 161-181.