Relationships between everyday knowledge and scientific knowledge: Understanding how matter changes

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1325-1343

  Crespo, Miguel Ángel Gómez ^a   Pozo, Juan Ignacio ^b  

^a Inst Educ Secundaria Victoria Kent   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244232795     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069042000205350     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersson, B. (1986). Pupils' explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions. Science Education, 70(5), 549-563.
2. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
3. Au, T.K-F. (1994). Developing an intuitive understanding of substance kinds. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 71-111.
4. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. and Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of Secondary School (London: Routledge).
5. Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change. Approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero (eds.) New Perspectives on Conceptual Change (Oxford: Elsevier).
6. Gómez Crespo, M.A. and Pozo, J.I. (2000). Las teorías sobre la estructura de la materia: discontinuidad y vacio [The theories about the structure of matter: discontinuity and vacuum]. Tarbiya, 26, 117-139.
7. Gómez Crespo, M.A. and Pozo, J.I. (2001). La consistencia de las teorías sobre la naturaleza de la materia: una comparación entre las teorias cientificas y las teorias implícitas [The consistency of the theories about the nature of matter: a comparison between scientific and implicit theories]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 24(4), 441-459.
8. Gómez Crespo, M.A., Pozo, J.I. and Sanz, A. (1995). Students' ideas on conservation of matter: effects of expertise and context variables. Science Education, 79(1), 77-93.
9. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
10. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D. and Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: modelling material kind. In S.M. Carver and D. Klahr (eds.) Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
11. Mortimer, E.F. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in the classroom discourse: an example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 67-82.
12. Nesher, P. and Sukenik, M. (1991). The effect of formal representation on the learning of ratio concepts. Learning and Instruction, 1(2), 161-175.
13. Nussbaum, J. (1985). The particulate nature of matter in the Gaseous Phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien (eds.) Children's Ideas in Science (Buckingham: Open University Press).
14. Posner, F.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. and Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
15. Pozo, J.I. and Gómez Crespo, M.A. (1998). Aprender y enseñar ciencia [Teaching and Learning Science] (Madrid: Morata).
16. Pozo, J.I., Gómez Crespo, M.A. and Sanz, A. (1999). When change does not mean replacement: different representations for different contexts. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero (eds.) New Perspectives on Conceptual Change (Oxford: Elsevier).
17. Reiner, M., Slotta, J., Chi, M.T.H. and Resnick, L. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: a commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1-16.
18. Stavy, R. (1995). Conceptual development of basic ideas in Chemistry. In S.M. Glynn and R. Duit (eds.) Learning Science in Schools (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).