AHP-based formal system for R&D project evaluation

Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 888-896

  Kumar, S Suresh ^a  

^a REGIONAL RESEARCH LABORATORY CSIR   (India)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchic process; Judgemental models; Peer rating; Priority setting; R D project evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 10244226751     PISSN: 00224456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. William D J, A study of decision models for R&D project selection, OR Quarterly, 20 (3)(1969) 361.
2. Sally T L, The analytic hierarchic process (Mc Graw Hill, New York) 1980.
3. Baker N R, R&D Project Selection Models, An assessment. IEEE Trans Engg Mgmt. 21 (4) (1974)165-171.
4. Costello D, A practical approach to R&D Project selection, Technol Forecast Soc. Change, 23(1983) 353-368.
5. Mills B & Kamau M, Methods of prioritizing research options (ISNAR, The Hagiee)1998, pp 322.
6. Libertore M J & Titus G J, The Practise of Management science in R&D project, Manage Sci 29 (8) (1983)962-974.
7. Monteith G Dm, R&D Administration (Hiffee Books Ltd, London )(1969).
8. Hartwich F & Janssen W, Setting research priorities, Res Evaluat, 9(3) (2000) 218.
9. Gass S I, Decision making - models and algorithms (John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York) 1985.
10. Schoemaker P J H & Waid C C, An experimental comparison of different approaches to derermining weights in additive utility models, Manage Sci, 28(2) (1982)182.
11. Libertore M J, An extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for industrial R&D project selection and research allocation, IEEE Trans Engg Mgmt, 34(1)(1987) 12.
12. Suresh Kumar S, Ganesh L S & Manoj Kumar N P, AHP based DSS, M Tech project thesis, IE & M Division, IIT, Madras, (1992).
13. Pinto J K & Selvin D P, Critical factors in successful project implementation, IEEE Trans Engg Mgmt, 34(1)(1987) 16-23.