Research guidelines in TESOL: Alternative perspectives: Linking observations to interpretations and uses in TESOL research

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 723-728

  Bachman, Lyle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10144249376     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588290     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2. Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bachman, L. F. (in press). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1).
4. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (in press). Language assessment in practice (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
6. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. Chapelle, C. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chapelle, C. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 254-272.
10. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1999). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.