메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 399-403

Do violations of the axioms of expected utility theory threaten decision analysis?

Author keywords

decision analysis; expected utility theory; independence axiom; normativeness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION THEORY; INDEPENDENCE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;

EID: 10144247893     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600410     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)

References (11)
  • 1
    • 0030066115 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is expected utility theory normative for medical ecision making?
    • Cohen B. Is expected utility theory normative for medical ecision making? Med Decis Making. 1996;16:1-6.
    • (1996) Med Decis Making , vol.16 , pp. 1-6
    • Cohen, B.1
  • 8
    • 0006773646 scopus 로고
    • Risk preference
    • Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds). Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group
    • Howard RA. Risk preference. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds). The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group, 1984;627-63.
    • (1984) The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis , pp. 627-663
    • Howard, R.A.1
  • 9
    • 0012857103 scopus 로고
    • The Evolution of decision analysis
    • Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds). Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group
    • Howard R The Evolution of decision analysis. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds). The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group, 1984;5-16.
    • (1984) The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis , pp. 5-16
    • Howard, R.1
  • 11
    • 0022818911 scopus 로고
    • Evaluating influence diagrams
    • Shachter R. Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper Res. 1986; 34:871-82.
    • (1986) Oper Res , vol.34 , pp. 871-882
    • Shachter, R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.