Dazed and confused? An exploratory study of the image of Brazil as a travel destination

Journal of Vacation Marketing

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 243-259

  Rezende Parker, Aline M ^a   Morrison, Alastair M ^a   Ismail, Joseph A ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brazil; destination image; destination selection; factor and cluster analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 10144228895     PISSN: 13567667     EISSN: 14791870     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135676670300900304     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Embratur (2001) 'Estudo da Demanda Turistica Internacional 2000, Brasilia'.
2. Free elicitation of descriptive adjectives for tourism image assessment.Journal of Travel Research. 1990;28 (4): 21-26.
3. A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
4. An assessment of the image of Mexico as a vacation destination and the influence of geographical location upon that image.Journal of Travel Research. 1979;17 (4): 18-23.
5. Tourism image: Attribute measurement of state tourism products using multidimensional techniques.Journal of Travel Research. 1989;28 (2): 16-20.
6. Five aspects of tourism image: A review.International Journal of Tourism Science. 2000;1 (1): 79-92.
7. Reilly, Free elicitation of descriptive adjectives for tourism image assessment.Journal of Travel Research. 1990;28 (4): 21-26.
8. Affective image of tourism destinations.Journal of Travel Research. 1997;35 (4): 11-15.
9. Ko and Park, A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
10. Crompton, A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
11. Dobni and Zinkhan, 1990, and Mazursky and Jacoby, 1986, both cited by Ko and Park.
12. The role of awareness and familiarity with a destination: The central Florida case.Journal of Travel Research. 1995;33 (3): 21-27.
13. Image formation process.Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing. 1993;2 (2/3): 191-215.
14. Exploring the touristic image of Jordan.Tourism Management. 1999;20 (4): 539-542.
15. French perceptions and images of the United States as a destination country.Tourism Analysis. 1998;3 (3/4): 159-171.
16. Perceptions of destination image: A study of Latin American intermediary travel buyers.Tourism Analysis. 1998;3 (3/4): 173-180.
17. Baloglu and Bringberg, An assessment of the image of Mexico as a vacation destination and the influence of geographical location upon that image.Journal of Travel Research. 1979;17 (4): 18-23.
18. Gartner, A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
19. Baloglu and McCleary, A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
20. The measurement of destination image: An empirical assessment.Journal of Travel Research. 1993;31 (4): 3-13.
21. Evidence for the assertion made in this sentence comes from Gartner, Ko and Park, A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
22. Gartner, A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research. 1999;26 (1): 868-897.
23. India's image as a tourist destination - A perspective of foreign tourists.Tourism Management. 2000;21 (3): 293-297.
24. Reilly, Free elicitation of descriptive adjectives for tourism image assessment.Journal of Travel Research. 1990;28 (4): 21-26.
25. Echtner and Ritchie, Perceptions of destination image: A study of Latin American intermediary travel buyers.Tourism Analysis. 1998;3 (3/4): 173-180.
26. Australia's image as a holiday destination: Perceptions of backpacker visitors.Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing. 1999;8 (3): 21-45.
27. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York: Macmillan; 1987:233-348.
28. Echtner and Ritchie, Perceptions of destination image: A study of Latin American intermediary travel buyers.Tourism Analysis. 1998;3 (3/4): 173-180.