Current status of the use of retroperitoneal approach for reconstructions of the aorta and its branches

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 224, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 501-508

  Clement Darling III, R ^a   Shah, Dhiraj M ^a   Chang, Benjamin B ^a   Paty, Philip S K ^a   Leather, Robert P ^a  

^a ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; AORTA GRAFT; AORTA RECONSTRUCTION; AORTA SURGERY; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEUM; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGERY;

AGED; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CELIAC ARTERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MESENTERIC ARTERIES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; SURVIVAL; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 10144227764     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199610000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Rob C. Extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta. Surgery 1963; 53:87-89.
2. Williams GM, Ricotta J, Zinner M, et al. The extended retroperitoneal approach for treatment of extensive atherosclerosis of the aorta and renal vessels. Surgery 1980; 88:846-855.
3. Darling RC III, Shah DM, Chang BB, et al. Retroperitoneal approach for bilateral renal and visceral artery revascularization. Am J Surg 1994; 168:148-151.
4. Chang BB, Shah DM, Paty PSK, et al. Can the retroperitoneal approach be used for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms? J Vasc Surg 1990; 11:326-330.
5. Leather RP, Darling RC III, Chang BB, Shah DM. Retroperitoneal in-line aortic bypass for treatment of infected infrarenal aortic grafts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175:491-494.
6. Saifi J, Shah DM, Chang BB, et al. Left retroperitoneal exposure for distal mesenteric artery repair. J Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 31:629-633.
7. Chang BB, Paty PSK, Shah DM, et al. The right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic surgery. Am J Surg 1989; 158:156-158.
8. Darling RC III, Kreienberg PB, Shah DM, et al. Aortic reconstruction and concomitant renal artery revascularization using the retroperitoneal approach: techniques and results. In: Wilson SE, ed. Seminars in Vascular Surgery. Vol. 9. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1996 (in press).
9. Shah DM, Chang BB, Paty PSK, et al. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm by exclusion and bypass: an analysis of outcome. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13:15-22.
10. Crawford ES, Saleh SA, Babb JW III, et al. Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: factors influencing survival after operation performed over a 25-year period. Ann Surg 1981; 193:699-709.
11. Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 1993; 1167-1171.
12. McCabe CJ, Coleman WS, Brewster DC. The advantage of early operation for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Surg 1981; 116:1025-1029.
13. Hertzer NR, Avellone JC, Farrell CJ, et al. The risk of vascular surgery in a metropolitan community: with observations on surgeon experience and hospital size. J Vasc Surg 1984; 1:13-21.
14. Johnston KW. Multicenter prospective study of nonruplured abdominal aortic aneurysms. II. Variables predicting morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg 1989; 9:437-447.
15. Sicard GA, Freeman MB, Vander Woude JC, et al. Comparison between the transabdominal and retroperitoneal approach for reconstruction of the infrarenal abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5:19-27.
16. Johnson JN, McLouglin GA, Wake PN, et al. Comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal methods of aortoiliac reconstruction: 20 year experience. J Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 27:561-564.
17. Peck JJ, McReynolds DG, Baker DH, et al. Extraperitoneal approach for aortoiliac reconstruction of the abdominal aorta. Am J Surg 1986; 151:620-623.
18. Leather RP, Shah DM, Kaufman JL, et al. Comparative analysis of retro-peritoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysm. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989; 268:387-393.
19. Sicard GA, Alien BT, Munn JS, Anderson CB. Retroperitoneal versus trans-peritoneal approach for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am 1989; 69:795-806.
20. Gregory RT, Wheeler JR, Snyder SO, et al. Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 30:185-189.
21. Darling RC III, Shah DM, McClellan WR, et al. Decreased morbidity associated with retroperitoneal exclusion treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1992; 33:65-69.
22. Sicard GA, Reilly JM, Rubin BG, et al. Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trail. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:174-183.
23. Cambria RP, Brewster DC, Abbott WM, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study. J Vasc Surg 1990; 11:314-325.
24. Stoney RJ, Ehrenfeld WK, Wylie EJ. Revascularization methods in chronic visceral ischemia caused by atherosclerosis. Ann Surg 1977; 186:468-476.
25. Reilly LM, Ramos TK, Murray SP, et al. Optimal exposure of the proximal abdominal aorta: a critical appraisal of transabdominal medial visceral rotation. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19:375-390.
26. Resnikoff M, Darling RC III, Chang BB, et al. The fate of the excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm sac: long term follow up of 831 patients. J Vasc Surg 1996 (in press).