Goal setting with six sigma mean shift determination

Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 577-583

  Maleyeff, John ^a   Krayenvenger, Darren ^b  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PRATT AND WHITNEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Manufacturing industries; Quality programmes; Statistical process control

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURE; AIRCRAFT PARTS AND EQUIPMENT; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CAPABILITY INDEX; QUALITY GOAL SETTING; QUALITY PROGRAMMES; SIX SIGMA MEAN SHIFT; STATISTICAL CONTROL CHARTS;

STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 10144220666     PISSN: 00022667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00022660410565490     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bhote, K.R. (2002), The Ultimate Six Sigma, American Management Association, New York, NY.
2. Bothe, D.R. (2002), "Statistical reason for the 1.5 σ shift", Quality Engineering, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 479-87.
3. Breyfogle, F.W., Cupello, J.M. and Meadows, B. (2001), Managing Six Sigma, Wiley, New York, NY.
4. Harry, M.J. and Lawson, J.R. (1992), Six Sigma Productivity Analysis and Process Characteristics, Motorola University Press, Schaumburg, IL.
5. Montgomery, D.C. (2001), Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, NY.
6. Truby, M. (2000), "Nasser, Ford embrace data-driven quality plan", Detroit News, 26 January, p. F1.
7. Wu, Z. (1995), "Process shift modes", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 53-60.