Comparison of arterial spin labeling and first-pass dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the assessment of pulmonary perfusion in humans: The inflow spin-tracer saturation effect

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1291-1301

  Lin, Yi Ru ^a,b   Wu, Ming Ting ^b,c   Huang, Teng Yi ^d   Tsai, Shang Yueh ^a   Chung, Hsiao Wen ^a,e   Mai, Vu M ^f   Chen, Cheng Yu ^e   Pan, Huay Ben ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^e TRI SERVICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^f EVANSTON HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced MRI; FAIR; Inflow tracer saturation; Pulmonary perfusion

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; TRACERS;

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISONS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; FAIR; FLOW SENSITIVE ALTERNATING INVERSION RECOVERIES; INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; PULMONARY PERFUSION;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

TRACER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FIRST PASS EFFECT; FLOW SENSITIVE ALTERNATING INVERSION RECOVERY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFLOW SPIN TRACER SATURATION EFFECT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG BLOOD FLOW; LUNG PERFUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SPIN LABELING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 10044284457     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20301     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lewis DH, Kott B, Jacobson AF. Single-photon emission tomography imaging of the chest. Respir Care 2001;46:940-945.
2. Hatabu H, Gaa J, Kim D, Li W, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Pulmonary perfusion: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using ultra-short TE and inversion recovery turbo FLASH. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:503-508.
3. Amundsen T, Kvaerness J, Jones RA, Waage A, Bjermer L, Nilsen G, Haraldseth O. Pulmonary embolism: detection with MR perfusion imaging of lung-a feasibility study. Radiology 1997;203:181-185.
4. Roberts DA, Gefter WB, Hirsch JA, Rizi RR, Dougherty L, Lenkinski RE, Leigh JS Jr, Schnall MD. Pulmonary perfusion: respiratory-triggered three-dimensional MR imaging with arterial spin tagging-preliminary results in healthy volunteers. Radiology 1999;212:890-895.
5. Uematsu H, Levin DL, Hatabu H. Quantification of pulmonary perfusion with MR imaging: recent advances. Eur J Radiol 2001;37:155-163.
6. Amundsen T, Torheim G, Kvistad KA, Waage A, Bjermer L, Nordlid KK, Johnsen H, Asberg A, Haraldseth O. Perfusion abnormalities in pulmonary embolism studied with perfusion MRI and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: an intra-modality and inter-modality agreement study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:386-394.
7. Lehnhardt S, Thorsten Winterer J, Strecker R, Hogerle S, Herget G, Geens V, Laubenberger J, Uhrmeister P. Assessment of pulmonary perfusion with ultrafast projection magnetic resonance angiography in comparison with lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with malignant stenosis. Invest Radiol 2002;37:594-599.
8. Berthezene Y, Croisille P, Wiart M, Howarth N, Houzard C, Faure O, Douek P, Amiel M, Revel D. Prospective comparison of MR lung perfusion and lung scintigraphy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:61-68.
9. Kim SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:293-301.
10. Mai VM, Berr SS. MR perfusion imaging of pulmonary parenchyma using pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques: FAIRER and FAIR. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:483-487.
11. Mai VM, Liu B, Polzin JA, Li W, Kurucay S, Bankier AA, Knight-Scott J, Madhav P, Edelman RR, Chen Q. Ventilation-perfusion ratio of signal intensity in human lung using oxygen-enhanced and arterial spin labeling techniques. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:341-350.
12. Amundsen T, Torheim G, Waage A, Bjermer L, Steen PA, Haraldseth O. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the lung: characterization of pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:224-231.
13. Hatabu H, Tadamura E, Levin DL, Chen Q, Li W, Kim D, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:1033-1038.
14. Wang T, Schultz G, Hebestreit H, Hebestreit A, Hahn D, Jakob PM. Quantitative perfusion mapping of the human lung using IH spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:260-265.
15. Roberts DA, Rizi RR, Lipson DA, Ferrante MA, Beam L, Rolf L, Baumgardner J, Yamomoto A, Hatabu H, Hansen-Flaschen J, Gefter WB, Schnall MD. Dynamic observation of pulmonary perfusion using continuous arterial spin-labeling in a pig model. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:175-180.
16. Levin DL, Chen Q, Zhang M, Edelman RR, Hatabu H. Evaluation of regional pulmonary perfusion using ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:166-171.
17. Chen Q, Levin DL, Kim D, David V, McNicholas M, Chen V, Jakob PM, Griswold MA, Goldfarb JW, Hatabu H, Edelman RR. Pulmonary disorders: ventilation-perfusion MR imaging with animal models. Radiology 1999;213:871-879.
18. Slavin GS, Wolff SD, Gupta SN, Foo TKF. First-pass myocardial perfusion MR imaging with interleaved notched saturation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:258-263.
19. Williamson JM, Lipsitz SR, Manatunga AK. Modeling kappa for measuring dependent categorical agreement data. Biostatistics 2000;1:191-202.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
21. Moller HE, Chen XJ, Saam B, Hagspiel KD, Johnson GA, Altes TA, de Lange EE, Kauczor HU. MRI of the lungs using hyperpolarized noble gases. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1029-1051.
22. Kauczor HU. Current issues in hyperpolarized gases in MRI: biomedical investigations and clinical applications. NMR Biomed 2000;13:173-175.
23. Johkoh T, Muller NL, Kavanagh PV, Cartier Y, Mayo JR, Tomiyama N, Murakami T, Naito H, Nakamura H, Moriya H. Scintigraphic and MR perfusion imaging in preoperative evaluation for lung volume reduction surgery: pilot study results. Radiat Med 2000;18:277-281.
24. Fratz S, Hess J, Schwaiger M, Martinoff S, Stem H. More accurate quantification of pulmonary blood flow magnetic resonance imaging than by lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with Fontan circulation. Circulation 2002;106:1510-1513.
25. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn Reson Med 1998;39:702-708.
26. Iwasawa T, Saito K, Ogawa N, Ishiwa N, Kurihara H. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary function using perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the lung. J Magn Ruson Imaging 2002;15:685-692.
27. Matsuoka S, Uchiyaina K, Shima H, Terakoshi H, Nojiri Y, Oishi S, Ogata H. Detectability of pulmonary perfusion defect and influence of breath holding on contrast-enhanced thick-slice 2D and on 3D MR pulmonary perfusion images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:580-585.
28. Carr JC, Laub G, Zheng J, Pereles FS, Finn JP. Time-resolved three-dimensional pulmonary MR angiography and perfusion imaging with ultrashort repetition time. Acad Radiol 2002;9:1407-1418.
29. Mulkern RV, Wong ST, Winalski C, Jolesz FA. Contrast manipulation and artifact assessment of 2D and 3D RARE sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8:557-566.