Rapid cell-deformability sensing system based on slit-flow laser diffractometry with decreasing pressure differential

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1291-1297

  Shin, Sehyun ^a   Ku, Yunhee ^a   Park, Myung Su ^a   Jang, Joo Hee ^a   Suh, Jang Soo ^b  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Deformability; Diffraction; RBC; Slit; Stress

Indexed keywords

CELL DEFORMABILITY; EKTACYTOMETRY DESIGN; ELONGATION INDEX (EI); SLIT-FLOW LASER DIFFRACTOMETRY;

BIOELECTRIC PHENOMENA; BIOSENSORS; BLOOD; CURVE FITTING; LASER APPLICATIONS; SHEAR STRESS;

CELLS;

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; BLOOD SAMPLING; ERYTHROCYTE DEFORMABILITY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LASER DIFFRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESSURE;

BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; ERYTHROCYTES; HUMANS; LASERS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 10044272753     PISSN: 09565663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.04.025     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bareford D., Stone P.C.W., Calwell N.M., Meiselman H.J., Stuart J. Comparison of instruments for measurement of erythrocyte deformability. Clin. Hemorheol. 5:1985;311-322
2. Baskurt, O.K., Edremitlioglu, M., Temitz, A., 1995. Effect of erythrocyte deformability on myocardial hemotocrit gradient. Am. J. Physiol. 268 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 37), H260-H264.
3. Bessis M., Mohandas N. A diffractometric method for the measurement of cellular deformability. Blood Cells. 1:1975;307-313
4. Bessis M., Mohandas N., Deo C. Automated ektacytometry: a new method of measuring red cell deformability and cell indices. Blood cells. 6:1980;315-327
5. Chien S. Shear dependence of effective cell volume as a determinant of blood viscosity. Science. 168:1970;977-979
6. Chien, S., 1978. Principles and techniques for assessing erythrocyte deformability. In: Bessis, M., Shohet, S.B., Mohandas, N. (Eds.), Red Cell Rheology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 71.
7. Chien S. Red cell deformability and its relevance to blood flow. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 49:1987;177-192
8. Dobbe, J.G.G., 2002. Engineering developments in hemorheology. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Amsterdam.
9. Fisher T.C., Wenby R.B., Meiselman H.J. Pulse shape analysis of RBC micropore flow via new software for the cell transit analyzer (CTA). Biorheology. 29:1992;185-202
10. Hardemann M.R., Goedhart P.T. Interrelationship of changes in hemorheological parameters induced by low osmolar radio-contrast media. Clin. Hemorheol. 12:1992;381-392
11. Holman R.C., Herron C.A., Sinnock P. Epidemiologic characteristics of mortality from diabetes with acidosis or coma, United States, 1970-78. Am. J. Public Health. 73:1983;1169-1173
12. Lowe, G., 1988. Clinical Blood Rheology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Macosko, C.W., 1993. Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications. VCH, New York.
14. Shin S., Keum D.Y., Ku Y.H. Blood viscosity measurement using a pressure-scanning capillary viscometer. KSME Int. J. 16:2002;1719-1724
15. Simchon, S., Jan, K.M., Chien, S., 1987. Influence of reduced red cell deformability on regional blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. 253 H898-H903.
16. Stuart T.C., Stone P.C.W., Freyburger G., Boisseau M.R., Altman D.G. Instrument precision and biological variability determine the number of patients required for rheological studies. Clin. Hemorheol. 9:1989;181-197