Ultrasound (US) guided central venous catheterization of internal jugular vein on over 65-year-old patients versus blind technique

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 267-268

  Cajozzo, Massimo ^a,b   Cocchiara, Gerlando ^a   Greco, Geo ^a   Vaglica, Roberto ^a   Bartolotta, Tommaso ^a   Platia, Lina ^a   Modica, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Central venous catheterization; Jugular vein; Ultrasounds

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SAFETY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 10044268504     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20150     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Lameris JS, Post PJM, Zonderland HM, et al.: Percutaneous placement of Hickman catheters: Comparison of sonografically guided and blind techniques. Am J Radiol 1990;155:1097-1099.
2. Downie AC, Reidy JF, Adam AN: Short communication: Tunnelled central venous catheter insertion via the internal jugular vein using a dedicated portable ultrasound device. Br J Radiol 1996;69:178-181.
3. Sznajder JL, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H: Central vein catheterisation. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:259-261.
4. Denys BG, Uretsky BF: Anatomical variations of internal jugular vein location: Impact on central venous access. Crit Care Med 1991;19:1516-1519.