Biological response to a supradescemetic synthetic cornea in rabbits

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 122, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1850-1855

  Stoiber, Josef ^a,b   Fernandez, Viviana ^a   Kaminski, Stephan ^c   Lamar, Peggy D ^a   Dubovy, Sander ^a   Alfonso, Eduardo ^a   Parel, Jean Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1 VINYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CORNEA CELL; CORNEA DISEASE; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; DEVICE; EUTHANASIA; EYE INFECTION; IMMUNOHISTOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; INFLAMMATORY CELL; KERATITIS; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CORNEA; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; EYE, ARTIFICIAL; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; PYRROLIDINONES; RABBITS;

EID: 10044268459     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.12.1850     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Strampelli B. Osteo-odontocheratoprotesi. Ann Ottalmol Clin Oculist. 1963;89:1039-1044.
2. Cardona H, DeVoe AG. Prosthokeratoplasty. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977;83:271-280.
3. Girard LJ. Keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 1983;2:207-224.
4. Falcinelli G, Barogi G, Taloni M. Osteoodontokeratoprosthesis: present experience and future prospects. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:193-194.
5. Lacombe E. Résultats de 30 kératoprothèses à fixation postérieure. J Fr Ophthalmol., 1993;16:426-434.
6. Temprano J. Keratoprosthesis with tibial autograft. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:192-193.
7. Worst JGF. Twenty-three years of keratoprosthesis research: present state of art. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:188-189.
8. Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Cecconi M, Caiazza S. New Dacron tissue colonisable keratoprosthesis: clinical experience. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:825-829.
9. Legais J-M, Renard G, Parel J-M, Savoldelli M, Pouliquen Y. Keratoprosthesis with biocolonizable microporous fluorocarbon haptic. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:757-763.
10. Dohlman CH, Waller SG, Netland PA. Keratoprosthesis surgery. In: Lindquist TD, Lindstrom RL, eds. Ophthalmic Surgery: Looseleaf and Update Service. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1996:1-32.
11. Kim MK, Lee JL, Wee WR, Lee JH. Seoul-type keratoprosthesis: preliminary results of the first 7 human cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:761-766.
12. Nouri M, Terada H, Alfonso EC, Foster CS, Durand ML, Dohlman CH. Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:484-489.
13. Mester U. Tierexperimentelle Ergebnisse mit Hydrogel-Keratoprothesen unterschiedlichen Wassergehaltes. Ophthalmologica. 1979;179:62-69.
14. Leibowitz HM, Trinkaus-Randall V, Tsuk AG, Franzblau C. Progress in the development of a synthetic cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1994;13:605-621.
15. Caldwell DR. The soft keratoprosthesis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1997:95:751-802.
16. Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Clayton AB, et al. Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:18-25.
17. Hicks C, Crawford G, Chirila T, et al. Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:149-170.
18. Crawford GJ, Hicks CR, Lou X, et al. The Chirila keratoprosthesis: phase I human clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:883-889.
19. Duchesne B, Parel J-M, Gautier S, et al. Non-penetrating keratoprosthesis. In: Parel J-M, Joos KM, Rol PO, eds. Ophthalmic Technologies VI. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE; 1996:136-138,
20. Kaminski S, Lacombe E, Duchesne B, et al. Eine neue, nicht penetrierende synthetische Hornhaut. Spektrum Augenheilkd. 2001;15:134-136.
21. Kaminski SL, Lacombe E, Duchesne B, et al. Supradescemetic keratoprosthesis (SD-KPro). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43: ARVO EAbstract 2993.
22. Stone W Jr, Herbert E. Experimental study of plastic material as replacement for cornea: a preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36:168-173.
23. Stone W Jr. Study of patency of openings in corneas anterior to interlamellar plastic artificial discs. Am J Ophthalmol. 1955;39:185-196.
24. Dohlman CH. Biology of complications following keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 1983;2:175-176.
25. Barber JC. Keratoprosthesis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1988;28:103-109.
26. Ohrloff C, Duffin RM, Apple DJ, Olson RJ. Opacification, vascularization, and chronic inflammation produced by hydrogel corneal lamellar implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98:422-425.
27. Duchesne B, Tahi H, Lacombe E, Parel J-M. Intrastromal corneal biocompatibility evaluation of new transparent materials for keratoprosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:S699.
28. Van Horn DL, Sendele DD, Seideman S, Buco PJ. Regenerative capacity of the corneal endothelium in rabbit and cat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977;16:597-613.
29. Wallentin N, Lundgren B, Holmén JB, Lundberg C. Development of posterior capsule opacification in the rabbit. Ophthalmic Res. 2002;34:14-22.
30. Lee JH, Wee WR, Chung ES, Kim HY, Park SH, Kim YH. Development of a newly designed double-fixed Seoul-type keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1673-1678.
31. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:755-764.
32. Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar P, et al. SupraDescemetic synthetic cornea (sDSC). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: ARVO EAbstract 4673.