Opposition and accommodation: An examination of Turkish teachers' attitudes toward Western approaches to the teaching of writing

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 66-97

  Clachar, Arlene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044253687     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BALLARD, B., & CLANCHY, J. (1989). Literacy in the university: An 'anthropological' approach. In G. Taylor (Ed.), Literacy by degrees (pp. 7-23). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
2. BALLARD, B., & CLANCHY, J. (1993). Assessment by misconception: Cultural influence and intellectual traditions. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 19-35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. BARKEY, H. (1992). Turkish-American relations in the post-war era. Orient, 33, 447-464.
4. BERLIN, J. (1984). Writing instruction in nineteenth-century American colleges. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
5. CANAGARAJAH, S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601-626.
6. DUFF, P. (1995). An ethnography of communication in immersion classrooms in Hungary. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 505-536.
7. FOX, H. (1994). Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8. GARDNER, R. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
9. KEH, C. (1990). Feedback in the writing of process: A model and methods for implementation. English Language Teaching Journal, 44, 294-304.
10. MCGROARTY, M. (1996). Language attitudes, motivation, and standards. In S. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 3-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. NAYAR, B. (1997). ESL/EFL dichotomy today: Language politics or pragmatics? TESOL Quarterly, 31, 9-27.
12. PENNYCOOK, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 589-618.
13. SANDER, O. (1990). Turkey and the Middle East. Turkish Review, 10, 47-62.
14. STANLEY, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217-233.
15. TURKKOLLU, N. (1994). The error hierarchy of Turkish EFL teachers in their assessment of compositions. Unpublished master's thesis, Bilkent University, Turkey.
16. ULICHNY, P., & WATSON-GEGEO, K. (1989). Interactions and authority:The dominant interpretive framework in writing conferences. Discourse Processes, 12, 309-328.
17. Zamel, V. (1987). Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 697-715.
18. ZUGHOUL, M. R., & TAMINIAN, L. (1984). The linguistic attitudes of Arab university students: Factorial structure and intervening variables. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 50, 155-179.