Resolution independent deformable model

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages 237-240

  Lachaud, J O ^a   Taton, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA ACQUISITION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; INTEGRATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; TOPOLOGY;

DEFORMABLE MODEL; GAUSSIAN FILTERS; RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 10044248254     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2004.1334140     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. D. Adalsteinsson and J. Sethian. A fast level set method for propagating interfaces. Journal of Computational Physics, 118(2):269-277, 1995.
2. V. Caselles, F. Catte, T. Coll, and P. Dibos. A geometric model for active contours. Numerische Mathematik, 66, 1993.
3. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. Sapiro. Geodesic active contours. In Proc. of ICCV95, pages 694-699, Boston MA, June 1995.
4. L. D. Cohen. On active contour models and balloons. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 53(2):211-218, mar 1991.
5. H. Delingette and J. Montagnat. New algorithms for controlling active contours shape and topology. In D. Vernon, editor, ECCV'2000, number 1843 in LNCS, pages 381-395, Dublin, Ireland, June 2000. Springer.
6. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321-331, 1987.
7. J.-O. Lachaud and A. Montanvert. Deformable meshes with automated topology changes for coarse-to-fine 3D surface extraction. Medical Image Analysis, 3(2):187-207, 1999.
8. J.-O. Lachaud and B. Taton. Deformable model with adaptive mesh and automated topology changes. In Proc. 4th Int. Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, Banff, Canada, pages 12-19. IEEE, 2003.
9. R. Malladi, J. A. Sethian, and B. C. Vemuri. Shape modelling with front propagation: A level set approach. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(2):158-174, feb 1995.
10. T. McInerney and D. Terzopoulos. Medical image segmentation using topologically adaptable snakes. In Proc. of Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine, pages 92-101, Nice, France, 1995. Springer.
11. T. McInerney and D. Terzopoulos. Medical image segmentation using topologically adaptable surfaces. In J. Troccaz, E. Grimson, and R. Mösges, editors, Proc. of CVRMed-MRCAS, volume 1205 of LNCS, pages 23-32, Grenoble, France, mar 1997. Springer.
12. J. Strain. Tree methods for moving interfaces. Journal of Computational Physics, 15(2):616-648, May 1999.
13. B. Taton and J.-O. Lachaud. Deformable model with non-euclidean metrics. In A. Heyden, G. Sparr, M. Nielsen, and P. Johansen, editors, Proc. ECCV'08, volume 2352 of LNCS, pages 438-453, Copenhagen, may 2002. Springer.
14. C. Xu and J. L. Prince. Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 7(3):359-369, mar 1998.
15. A. Yezzi, Jr., S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver, and A. Tannenbaum. A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 16(2):199-209, apr 1997.