An Empirical Study of Active Learning with Support Vector Machines for Japanese Word Segmentation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2002-July, Issue , 2002, Pages 505-512

  Sassano, Manabu ^a  

^a FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LAKES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ACTIVE LEARNING; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING CURVES; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NON-TRIVIAL TASKS; NOVEL TECHNIQUES; SUPPORT VECTORS MACHINE; TEST CASE; WORD SEGMENTATION;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 10044241417     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Michele Banko and Eric Brill. 2001. Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation. In Proceedings of ACL-2001, pages 26-33.
2. Ido Dagan and Sean P. Engelson. 1995. Committeebased sampling for training probabilistic classifiers. In Proceedings of the Tweleveth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 150-157.
3. Susan Dumais, John Platt, David Heckerman, and Mehran Sahami. 1998. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. In Proceedings of the ACM CIKM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 148-155.
4. EDR (Japan Electoric Dictionary Research Institute), 1995. EDR Electoric Dictionary Technical Guide.
5. Rebecca Hwa. 2000. Sample selection for statitical grammar induction. In Proceedings of EMNLP/VLC 2000, pages 45-52.
6. Thorsten Joachims. 1998. Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning.
7. Taku Kudo and Yuji Matsumoto. 2000a. Japanese dependency structure analysis based on support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pages 18-25.
8. Taku Kudo and Yuji Matsumoto. 2000b. Use of support vector learning for chunk identification. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on CoNLL-2000 and LLL- 2000, pages 142-144.
9. Taku Kudo and Yuji Matsumoto. 2001. Chunking with support vector machines. In Proceedings of NAACL 2001, pages 192-199.
10. David D. Lewis andWilliam A. Gale. 1994. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Rettrieval, pages 3-12.
11. Andrew Kachites McCallum and Kamal Nigam. 1998. Employing EM and pool-based active learning for text classification. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 359-367.
12. Grace Ngai and David Yarowsky. 2000. Rule writing or annotation: Cost-efficient resource usage for base noun phrase chunking. In Proceedings of ACL-2000, pages 117-216.
13. John C. Platt. 1999. Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In Bernhard Schölkopf, Christopher J.C. Burges, and Alexander J. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning, pages 185-208. MIT Press.
14. Greg Schohn and David Cohn. 2000. Less is more: Active learning with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning.
15. Hiroyuki Shinnou. 2000. Deterministic Japanese word segmentation by decision list method. In Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 822.
16. Cynthia A. Thompson, Mary Leaine Califf, and Raymond J. Mooney. 1999. Active learning for natural language parsing and information extraction. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 406-414.
17. Simon Tong and Daphne Koller. 2000. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning.
18. Antal van den Bosch, Walter Daelemans, and Ton Weijters. 1996. Morphological analysis as classification: an inductive-learning approach. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on New Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 79-89.
19. Vladimir N. Vapnik. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag.
20. David Yarowsky and Richard Wicentowski. 2000. Minimally supervised morphological analysis by multimodal alignment. In Proceedings of ACL-2000, pages 207-216.
21. David Yarowsky. 1995. Unsupervised word sence disambiguation rivaling supvervised methods. In Proceedings of ACL-1995, pages 189-196.