Auditory brainstem implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

Laryngoscope

Volumn 114, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2135-2146

  Kanowitz, Seth J ^a   Shapiro, William H ^a   Golfinos, John G ^a   Cohen, Noel L ^a   Roland Jr , J Thomas ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem implant; Deafness; Neurofibromatosis type 2

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOLOGY; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANTATION; MALE; NEUROFIBROMATOSIS; PATIENT EDUCATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY BRAIN STEM IMPLANTATION; AUDITORY BRAIN STEM IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROFIBROMATOSIS 2; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10044240794     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149447.52888.f6     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Wishart JH. Case of tumors in the skull, dura mater and brain. Edinburgh Med Surg J 1822;18:393-397.
2. Rouleau GA, Wertelecki W, Haines JL, et al. Genetic linkage of bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis to a DNA marker on chromosome 22. Nature 1987;329:246-248.
3. MacCollin M, Mohney T, Trofatter J, et al. DNA diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 2: altered coding sequence of the merilin tumor suppressor in an extended pedigree. JAMA 1993; 270:2316-2320.
4. Heller JW, Brackmann DE, Tucci DL, et al. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory and cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1996;17: 724-729.
5. Erber NP, Alencewicz CM. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Disord 1976;41:256-257.
6. Elliott L, Katz D. Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS). St. Louis, MO: Auditec, 1980.
7. Owens E, Kessler D, Raggio M, et al. Analysis and revision of the minimal auditory capabilities (MAC) battery. Ear Hear 1985;6:280-290.
8. Hoffman RA. Cerebrospinal fluid leak following acoustic neuroma removal. Laryngoscope 1994;104:40-58.
9. Mamikoglu B, Wiet RJ, Esquivel CR. Translabyrinthine approach for the management of large and giant vestibular schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:224-227.
10. Roland JT Jr. Complications of cochlear implant surgery. In: Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, eds. Cochlear Implants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2000;171-175.
11. Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, et al. Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: an update on performance in 61 patients. J Neurosurg 2002;96:1063-1071.
12. Otto SR, Shannon RV, Brackmann DE, et al. The multichannel auditory brain stem implant: performance in twenty patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:291-303.
13. Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Nelson RA, et al. Auditory brainstem implant: issues in surgical implantation. Otolarnygol Head Neck Surg 1993;108:624-633.
14. Otto SR, Staller S. Multichannel auditory brain stem implant: case studies comparing fitting strategies and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:36-39.