Adaptive classifiers for multisource OCR

International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 154-166

  Veeramachaneni, Sriharsha ^a   Nagy, George ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Digit recognition; Interpattern feature dependence; Optical character recognition; Quadratic discriminant; Style; Writer consistency

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DIGIT RECOGNITION; INTERPATTERN FEATURE DEPENDENCE; QUADRATIC DISCRIMINANTS; STYLE; WRITER CONSISTENCY;

COMPUTER VISION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

EID: 10044238381     PISSN: 14332833     EISSN: 14332825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10032-003-0108-x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baird HS, Nagy G (1994) A self-correcting 100-font classifier. In: Vincent L, Pavlidis T (eds) Document recognition. Proc SPIE 2181:106-115
2. Casey RG, Nagy G (1968) An autonomous reading machine. IEEE Trans Comput C-17(5):492-503
3. Castelli V, Cover TM (1996) The relative value of labeled and unlabeled samples in pattern recognition with an unknown mixing parameter. IEEE Trans Informat Theory 42:2102-2117
4. Chiavaccini E, Vitetta GM (2001) MAP symbol estimation on frequency-flat Rayleigh fading channels via a Bayesian EM algorithm. IEEE Trans Commun 49(11):1869-1872
5. Dempster AP, Laird MM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc 39(1):1-38
6. Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, New York
7. Friedman H (1989) Regularized discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 84(405):166-175
8. Gauvain JL, Lee CH (1994) Maximum a posteriori estimation for multivariate Gaussian mixture observations of Markov chains. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 2(2):291-298
9. Grother P (1995) Handprinted forms and character database, NIST special database 19. Technical report and CDROM.
10. Ho TK, Nagy G OCR with no shape training. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on pattern recognition, Barcelona, September 2000, pp 27-30
11. Leggetter CJ, Woodland PC (1995) Maximum likelihood linear regression for speaker adaptation of continuous density hidden Markov models. Comput Speech Lang 9(2):171-185
12. Liu CL, Sako H, Fujisawa H (2002) Performance evaluation of pattern classifiers for handwritten character recognition. IJDAR 4(3):191-204
13. Lucky RW(1966) Techniques for adaptive equalization of digital communication systems. Bell Sys Tech J 45:255-286
14. Mathis C, Breuel T (2002) Classification using a hierarchical Bayesian approach. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on pattern recognition, QUEBEC CITY, AUGUST 2002, 4:103-106
15. Nagy G, Shelton Jr GL (1966) Self-corrective character recognition system. IEEE Trans Informat Theory IT12(2):215-222
16. Nagy G, Seth S, Einspahr K (1987) Decoding substitution ciphers by means of word matching with application to OCR. IEEE Trans Patt Analysis Mach Intell 9(5):710-715
17. Redner RA, Walker HF (1984) Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Rev 26(2):195-239
18. Selfridge OG, Neisser U (1960) Pattern recognition by machine. Sci Am 203:60-68
19. Shashahani BM, Landgrebe DA (1994) The effect of unlabeled samples in reducing the small sample size problem and mitigating the Hughes phenomenon. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 32(5):1087-1095
20. Veeramachaneni S (2002) Style constrained quadratic field classifiers. PhD thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY