Interactive activation in visual word recognition: Constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1064-1076

  Stolz, Jennifer A ^a   Stevanovski, Biljana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 10044234030     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1064     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389-401.
2. Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468-482.
3. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 272-276.
4. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
5. Briand, K. A., & Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 401-406.
6. Brown, M., & Besner, D. (2002). Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of an expectancy. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 402-422.
7. Brown, M., & Besner, D. (in press). Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphologic contexts in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
8. Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., & Carr, T. H. (2002). Spatial attention and word recognition in Stroop color naming: Is word recognition automatic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 220-240.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Fenske, M. J. (2001). The common object hypothesis: Understanding when top-down and bottom-up influences interact in attentional processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
11. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
12. Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., & Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 484-492.
13. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1996). Selective attention operates at two processing loci. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 439-458). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44(A), 69-104.
16. Kingstone, A., & Egly, R. (2004). Attention to space and objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Klein, R. M. (1994). Perceptual-motor expectancies interact with covert visual orienting under conditions of endogenous but not exogenous control. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 167-181.
18. Klein, R. M., & Shore, D. I. (2000). Relations among modes of visual orienting. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 195-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
20. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject design. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
21. McCann, R. S., Folk, C. L., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1015-1029.
22. Meyer, D., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669-682). New York: Academic Press.
23. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 32(A), 3-25.
24. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
25. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
26. Schneider, W. (1995). MEL professional user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
27. Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1996). The role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1166-1177.
28. Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1998). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between semantic and morphological processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1642-1655.
29. Stolz, J. A., & McCann, R. S. (2000). Visual word recognition: Reattending to the role of spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1320-1331.
30. Stolz, J. A., & Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 596-611.
31. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37(A), 571-590.
32. Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(A), 631-650.
33. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.