A simple multistage field test for the prediction of anaerobic capacity in female games players

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 784-789

  Cooper, S M ^a   Baker, J S ^b   Eaton, Z E ^a   Matthews, N ^a  

^a CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAEROBIC CAPACITY; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; CALIBRATION; COLLEGE STUDENT; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MULTISTAGE SHUTTLE RUN TEST; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPORTS;

EID: 10044226286     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.012229     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lange Andersen K, Shephard R, Denolin H, et al. Fundamentals of exercise testing. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1971.
2. 2max. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982;49:1-12.
3. Léger L, Mercier D, Gadoury C, et al. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sc 1988;6:93-101.
4. Ramsbottom R, Brewer J, Williams C. A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med 1988;22:141-4.
5. Bouchard C, Taylor A, Simoneau J-A, et al. Testing anaerobic power and capacity. In: MacDougall J, Wenger H, Green H, eds. Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1991:175-221.
6. Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner J. The Wingate anaerobic test. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics, 1996.
7. Ramsbottom R, Nevill M, Nevill A, et al. Accumulated oxygen deficit and shuttle run performance in physically active men and women. J Sports Sci 1997;15:207-14.
8. 2 deficit. J Appl Physiol 1988;64:50-60.
9. Medbø J, Tabata I. Relative importance of aerobic and anaerobic energy release during short-lasting exhausting bicycle exercise. J Appl Physiol 1989;67:1881-6.
10. Green S, Dawson B. Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans: definitions, limitations and unsolved problems. Sports Med 1993;15:312-27.
11. 2 deficit an accurate quantitative measure of anaerobic energy production during intense exercise? J Appl Physiol 1992;73:1207-8.
12. Maxwell N, Nimmo M. Anaerobic capacity: a maximal anaerobic running test versus the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit. Can J Appl Physiol 1996;21:35-47.
13. Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test: an update of methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med 1987;4:381-94.
14. In: Bird S, Davidson R, eds. Guidelines for the physiological testing of athletes, 3rd ed. Leeds: British Association of Sport & Exercise Sciences, 1997.
15. Scott C, Roby F, Lohman T, et al. The maximally accumulated oxygen deficit as an indicator of anaerobic capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:618-24.
16. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10.
17. Atkinson G, Nevill A. Selected issues in the design and analysis of sport performance research. J Sports Sci 2001;19:811-27.
18. Winter E, MacLaren D. Assessment of maximal-intensity exercise. In: Eston R, Reilly T, eds. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: volume 2: exercise physiology. 2nd ed. London: E & FN Span, 2001:263-88.
19. Schmidt-Nielsen K. Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
20. Nevill A, Ramsbottom R, Williams C, et al. Scaling individuals of different body size. J Sports Sci 1992;9:427-8.
21. Winter E, Nevill A. Scaling: adjusting for differences in body size. In: Eston R, Reilly T, eds. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: volume 2: exercise physiology. 2nd ed. London: E & FN Spon, 2001:275-93.
22. Brewer J, Ramsbottom R, Williams C. Multistage fitness test. Leeds: National Coaching Foundation, 1988.
23. Minitab Inc. Minitab Reference Manual. Philadelphia: Minitab Inc, 1995.
24. Atkinson G, Nevill A. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998;26:217-38.
25. Nevill A, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med 1997;31:314-18.
26. Baker J, Ramsbottom R, Hazeldine R. Maximal shuttle running over 40 m as a measure of maximal exercise performance. Br J Sports Med 1993;27:228-32.
27. Bland J, Altman D. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;32:307-17.
28. Atkinson G. A comparison of statistical methods for assessing measurement repeatability in ergonomics research. In: Atkinson G, Reilly T, eds. Sport, leisure and ergonomics. London: E & FN Spon, 1995:218-22.
29. Bates B, Zhang S, Dufek J. The effects of sample size and variability on the correlation coefficient. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:386-91.
30. Tharp G, Newhouse R, Uffleman L, et al. Comparison of sprint and run times with performance on the Wingate Anaerobic Test. Res Q 1984;56:73-6.
31. Patton J, Kraemer W, Knuttgen H, et al. Factors in maximal power production and in exercise endurance relative to maximal power. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990;60:222-7.
32. Davis J, Brewer J. Applied physiology of female soccer players. Sports Med 1993;16:180-9.
33. Nevill A. Validity and measurement agreement in sports performance [editorial]. J Sports Sci 1996;14:199.
34. Vincent W. Statistics in kinesiology, 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999.