Chemical characterization of Patagonian shrubs with different herbivore preference;Caracterización química de arbustos patagónicos con diferente preferencia por parte de los herbívoros

Ecologia Austral

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 215-222

  Cavagnaro, Fernando P ^a   Golluscio, Rodolfo A ^a   Wassner, Diego F ^a   Ravetta, Damián A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Adesmia campestris; Grazing; Mulinum spinosum; Secondary metabolites; Senecio filaginoides

Indexed keywords

FOOD PREFERENCE; GRAZING; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; SECONDARY METABOLITE;

ARGENTINA; CHUBUT; PATAGONIA; SOUTH AMERICA;

ADESMIA; ADESMIA CAMPESTRIS; MULINUM; MULINUM SPINOSUM; OVIS ARIES; SENECIO; SENECIO FILAGINOIDES;

EID: 0942299932     PISSN: 03275477     EISSN: 1667782X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AGRAWAL, AA & MT RUTTER. 1998. Dynamic antiherbivore defence in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos 83:227-236.
2. AGUIAR, MR & OE SALA. 1994. Competition, facilitation, seed distribution and the origin of patches in a Patagonian steppe. Oikos 70:26-34.
3. AGUIAR, MR; A SORIANO & OE SALA. 1992. Competition and facilitation in the recruitment of seedlings in the Patagonian steppe. Funct. Ecol. 6:66-70.
4. BONVISSUTO, G; E MORICZ DE TECSO; O ASTIBIA & J ANCHORENA. 1983. Resulta dos preliminares sobre los hábitos dietarios de ovinos en un pastizal semidesértico de Patagonia. IDIA 36(supl. ):243-253.
5. BUCHANAN, RA; IM CULL; FH OTEY & CR RUSSELL. 1978. Hydrocarbon- and rubber-producing crops. Evaluation of U.S. plant species. Econ. Bot. 32:131-145.
6. BURKART, A; L BRAVO; MN CORREA; RH FORTUNATO; RN GIANGUALANI ET AL. 1984. Leguminosae. Pp. 89-297 en: Flora patagónica. Tomo VIII. Parte IVb. Colección Científica, INTA. Buenos Aires.
7. CABRERA, AL. 1971. Compositae. Pp. 1-432 en: Flora patagónica. Tomo VIII. Parte VII. Colección Científica, INTA. Buenos Aires.
8. CIPOLLINI, D. 1998. Induced defences and phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:200.
9. COLEY, PD; JP BRYANT & FS CHAPIN III. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defence. Science 230:895-899.
10. CONSTANCE, L. 1988. Umbelliferae. Pp. 310-379 en: Flora patagónica. Tomo VIII. Parte V. Colección Científica, INTA. Buenos Aires.
11. COUGHENOUR, MB. 1985. Graminoid responses to grazing by large herbivores: adaptations, exaptations, and interacting processes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:852-863.
12. DOMÍNGUEZ, XA. 1973. Métodos de investigación fitoquímica. Limusa. México DF.
13. ERDFELDER, E; F FAUL & A BUCHNER. 1996. GPower: a general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Meth. Ins. C. 28:1-11.
14. FEENY, PP. 1976. Plant antiherbivore defence. Pp. 1-40 en: JW Wallace & RL Mansell (eds). Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent advances in Phytochemistry. Vol. 10. Plenum. New York.
15. FERNÁNDEZ, RJ; AH NUNEZ & A SORIANO. 1992. Contrasting demography of two Patagonian shrubs under different conditions of sheep grazing and resource supply. Oecologia 91:39-46.
16. FERNÁNDEZ, RJ & JM PARUELO. 1988. Root system of two Patagonian shrubs: A quantitative description using a geometrical method. J. Range Manage. 41:220-223.
17. FERNÁNDEZ, RJ; OE SALA & RA GOLLUSCIO. 1991. Woody and herbaceous aboveground production of a Patagonian steppe. J. Range Manage. 44:434-437.
18. GOLLUSCIO, RA; RJC LEÓN & S PERELMAN. 1982. Caracterización fitosociológica de la estepa del oeste del Chubut. Su relación con el gradiente ambiental. Bol. Soc. Arg. Bot. 21:299-324.
19. GRIME, JP. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation process. John Wiley. Chichester.
20. GRUBB, PJ. 1992. A positive distrust in simplicity: lessons from plant defences and from competition among plants and among animals. J. Ecol. 80:585-610.
21. HORNER, JD. 1988. Astringency of Douglas-fir foliage in relation to phenology and xylem pressure potential. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1227-1237.
22. HURLBERT, SH. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187-211.
23. KARBAN, R; AA AGRAWAL & M MANGEL. 1997. The benefits of induced defenses against herbivores. Ecology 78:1351-1355.
24. LAUENROTH, WK. 1998. Guanacos, spiny shrubs and the evolutionary history of grazing in the Patagonian steppe. Ecología Austral 8:211-216.
25. LEÓN, RJC; D BRAN; M COLLANTES; JM PARUELO & A SORIANO. 1998. Grandes unidades de vegetación de la Patagonia extra andina. Ecología Austral 8:125-144.
26. MILCHUNAS, DG; OE SALA & WK LAUENROTH. 1988. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am. Nat. 132:87-106.
27. MILEWSKI, AV; TP YOUNG & D MADDEN. 1991. Thorns as induced defenses. Experimental evidence. Oecologia 86:70-75.
28. OWEN-SMITH, N. 1982. Factors influencing the consumption of plants products by large herbivores. Pp. 359-404 en: FJ Huntley & BH Walker (eds). Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer-Verlag. New York.
29. PERELMAN, SB; RJC LEÓN & JP BUSSACCA. 1997. Floristic changes related to grazing intensity ina Patagonian shrub steppe. Ecography 20:400-406.
30. PYYKKO, M. 1966. The leaf anatomy of East Patagonian xeromorphic plants. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 3:453-622.
31. RHOADES, DF & RG CATES. 1976. Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Pp. 168-213 en: JW Wallace & RL Mansell (eds). Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent advances in Phytochemistry. Vol. 10. Plenum. New York.
32. SOMLO, R; C DURANONA & R ORTIZ. 1985. Valor nutritivo de especies forrajeras patagónicas. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim. 5:589-605.
33. SOMLO, R; A PELLIZA; P WILLEMS; V NAKAMATSU & A MANERO. 1997. Atlas dietario de herbívoros patagónicos. PRODESAR-INTA-GTZ. San Carlos de Bariloche.
34. WINK, M. 1988. Plant breeding: importance of plant secondaries metabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivores. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:225-233.