Determination of material parameters for 7475 Al alloy from bulge forming tests at constant stress

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 145, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 352-359

  Aoura, Youssef ^a   Ollivier, David ^a   Ambari, Abdelhak ^a   Dal Santo, Philippe ^a  

^a Arts et Metiers ParisTech   (France)

Author keywords

7475 Al alloy; FE simulation; Material parameters; Power law; Superplastic bulge forming

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE INDUSTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METAL FORMING; POLYCRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; RHEOLOGY; STRESSES; SUPERPLASTICITY;

MATERIAL PARAMETERS; POWER LAW; SUPERPLASTIC BULGE FORMING;

ALUMINUM ALLOYS;

EID: 0942299355     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chandra N. Constitutive behavior of superplastic materials. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 37:2002;461-484.
2. Wert J.A., Paton N.E., Hamilton C.H., Mahoney M.W. Grain refinement in 7075 aluminium by thermomechanical processing. Metall. Trans. A. 12:1981;1267-1276.
3. Kashyap B.P., Tangri K. On the contribution of concurrent grain growth to strain sensitive flow of a superplastic Al-Cu eutectic alloy. Metall. Trans. A. 18:1987;417.
4. Woodford D.A. Strain rate sensitivity as a measure of ductility. Trans. ASM. 62:1969;291-293.
5. Huang A., Lowe A., Cardew-Hall M.J. Experimental validation of sheet thickness optimisation for superplastic forming of engineering structures. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 112:2001;136-143.
6. Booeshaghi F., Garmestani H. On the application of load relaxation in characterizing superplastic Al-Li8090. Scripta Mater. 40:1999;509-516.
7. F.U. Enikeev, Determination of the threshold stress for superplastic flow, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2000) 22-31.
8. Vasin R.A., Enikeev F.U., Mazurski M.I. Determination of the strain rate sensitivity of a superplastic material at constant load test. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 224:1997;131-135.
9. Hambli R., Potiron A. Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modeling of superplastic forming processes. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 190:2001;4871-4880.
10. Lee K.S., Huh H. Simulation of superplastic forming/diffusion bonding with finite-element analysis using the convective coordinate system. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 89-90:1999;92-98.
11. Kim Yong H., Hong S., Lee S.J., Wagoner R.H. Analysis of superplastic forming processes using a finite-element method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 62:1996;90-99.
12. Carrino L., Giuliano G. Modelling of superplastic blow forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 39:1997;193-199.
13. Jovane F. An approximate analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm: theory and experiments. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 10:1968;403-424.
14. Enikeev F.U., Kruglov A.A. An analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 37:1995;473-483.
15. Cheng J.-H. The determination of material parameters from superplastic inflation tests. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 58:1996;233-246.
16. Yang F.C., Chiu H.L., Lee C.S. Superplastic forming of 7475 Al alloy by variable-pressure blowing. Material. 34:1996;1555-1560.
17. Hasegawa T., Okazaki K. An interpretation of the true stress-true stain behavior for a mechanically milled, superplastic Al-Mg-Cu alloy from a dislocation dynamics viewpoint. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 277:2000;284-290.