![]() |
Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 262-269
|
Further comparison of temporomandibular joint prosthesis systems [2]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ALLOY;
ALUMINUM;
CHROMIUM;
COBALT;
METAL;
MOLYBDENUM;
NICKEL;
POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);
POLYETHYLENE;
STAINLESS STEEL;
TITANIUM;
ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYTHEYLENE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
VANADIUM;
ALLERGY;
ALLOGRAFT;
ANALGESIA;
ARTHROPLASTY;
AUTOGRAFT;
BIOMECHANICS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
HIP PROSTHESIS;
JOINT PROSTHESIS;
LETTER;
MATERIALS TESTING;
METAL ALLERGY;
OSTEOLYSIS;
POROSITY;
PROSTHESIS FAILURE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT PROSTHESIS;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
NOTE;
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT;
HUMANS;
JOINT PROSTHESIS;
PROSTHESIS FAILURE;
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0942276331
PISSN: 02782391
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.11.007 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (0)
|