Literacy Learning as Gendered Identity Work

Communication Education

Volumn 52, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 273-285

  Godley, Amanda J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom discourse; Gender; Identity; Literacy education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0942268014     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0363452032000156244     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discouse: The language of teaching and learning. (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
4. Dyson, A. H. (1995). Writing children: Reinventing the development of childhood literacy. Written Communication, 12, 4-46.
5. Dyson, A. H., & Freedman, S. W. (1991). Critical challenges for research on writing and literacy: 2990-1995 (Technical Report No. 1-B). Berkeley, CA: National Center for the Study of Writing.
6. Finders, M. J. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teacher College Press.
7. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: The Falmer Press.
8. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9. Huckin, T. N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 95-111). Paris: USIS.
10. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 575-611.
11. Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Orellana, M. F. (1995, April). Good guys and "bad" girls: Gendered identity construction in a writing workshop. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
14. Orellana, M. F. (1996). Negotiating power through language in classroom meetings. Linguistics and Education, 8, 335-365.
15. Rex, L. A. (2003). Loss of the creature: The obscuring of inclusivity in classroom discourse. Communication Education, 52, 30-46.
16. Sperling, M. (1995). Uncovering the role of role in writing and learning to write: One day in an inner-city classroom. Written Communication, 12, 93-133.
17. Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.) Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Wertch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.