Convection in a very compressible fluid: Comparison of simulations with experiments

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 5 2, 2003, Pages 563091-563097

  Furukawa, A ^a   Meyer, H ^b   Onuki, A ^a   Kogan, A B ^b,c  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEMPERATURE FLUCTUATIONS; TEMPERATURE GRADIENT; TIME CONSTANT;

ASPECT RATIO; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMPING; DIFFUSION; ENTHALPY; FREQUENCY MODULATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; STEADY FLOW; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; THERMAL EFFECTS; THERMAL GRADIENTS; THERMOMETERS;

HEAT CONVECTION;

EID: 0942267619     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A.B. Kogan and H. Meyer, Phys. Rev. E 63, 056310 (2001).
2. H. Meyer and A.B. Kogan, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056310 (2002).
3. Y. Chiwata and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 144301 (2001).
4. A. Furukawa and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016302 (2002).
5. S. Amiroudine and B. Zappoli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 105303 (2003); S. Amiroudine (private communication).
6. S. Amiroudine and B. Zappoli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 105303 (2003); S. Amiroudine (private communication).
7. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 6 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1959).
8. c] = 850±200 for 0.05<ε<0.2, and then rises steeply as e further decreases. A plot is available as a pdf from one of the authors (H.M.).
9. G. Ahlers, M. Cross, P. Hohenberg, and S. Safran, J. Fluid Mech. 110, 297 (1982).
10. M. Gitterman and V. Steinberg, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 34, 305 (1971); M. Gitterman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 85 (1978).
11. M. Gitterman and V. Steinberg, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 34, 305 (1971); M. Gitterman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 85 (1978).
12. P. Carlès and B. Ugurtas, Physica D 126, 69 (1999).
13. D.J. Tritton, Physical Fluid Dynamics (Oxford Science, Oxford, 1988), Sec. 14.6.
14. A. Schlueter, D. Lortz, and F. Busse, J. Fluid Mech. 23, 129 (1965).
15. R.P. Behringer, A. Onuki, and H. Meyer, J. Low Temp. Phys. 81, 71 (1990).
16. R.P. Behringer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 657 (1985).
17. L. El Khouri and P. Carlès, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066309 (2002).
18. instab from an analysis of experimental data corrected for the instrumental time lag, and have found them to be consistent with their calculations for scenarios (a) and (b) where the initial rise of ΔT(t) is not too rapid and the correction can be carried out [L. El Khouri and P. Carlès (private communication)].
19. The absence of noise in simulations, its presence in a physical system, and the resulting impact on the growth of perturbations in the convective state were pointed out to one of us (H.M.) by P. Carlès (private communication).
20. J.J. Niemela and R.J. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2431 (1987).