Introduction to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Radiology: Principles and Practical Application

Academic Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-148

  Carlos, Ruth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HYPOTHESIS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SKILL; THINKING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINA BLEEDING;

EID: 0942265690     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00649-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Littenberg B. Technology assessment in medicine. Academic Medicine 1992; 67(7):424-428.
2. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:88-94.
3. Carlos RC, Hussain HK, Song JH, Francis IR. The added value of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA as an intrabiliary contrast agent: a preliminary assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:87-92.
4. Gur D, King JL, Rockette HE, et al. Practical issues of experimental ROC analysis. Selection of controls. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:583-586.
5. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263:2753-2759.
6. Bree RL, Bowerman RA, Bohm-Velez M, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, DeDreu S, Punch MR. US evaluation of the uterus in patients with postmenopausal bleeding: A positive effect on diagnostic decision making. Radiology 2000; 216(1):260-264.
7. Bree RL, Carlos RC. US for postmenopausal bleeding: Consensus development and patient-centered outcomes. Radiology 2002; 222:595-598.
8. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.
9. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 1986; 5:1-30.
10. Kaplan RM, Ernst JA. Do category rating scales produce biased preference weights for a health index? Med Care 1983; 21:193-207.
11. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med Care 2000; 38(suppl): 11138-11150.
12. Carlos RC, Goold SD, Hendrix S. What do women want? Attitudes regarding diagnostic testing and diagnostic information in postmenopausal bleeding. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:598.
13. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996; 276:1253-1258.
14. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
15. Mauskopf JA, Paul JE, Grant DM, Stergachis A. The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13:277-88.
16. Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick AM, Weissert WG. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making 2000; 20(3):332-3s42.
17. Carlos RC, Fendrick AM, Abrahamse PH, Bree RH. Cost-effectiveness of saline-assisted hysterosonography and office hysteroscopy in evaluating post-menopausal bleeding: A decision analysis. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:879-87.