Hearing Aid Accessories for Adults: The Remote FM Microphone

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 22-33

  Boothroyd, Arthur ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Phonic Ear Inc   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; MICROPHONE; NOISE; PHONEME; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0842342684     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000111260.46595.EC     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1994). Guidelines for fitting and monitoring FM systems. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on FM Systems and Auditory Trainers. AHSA, 36(Suppl. 12), 1-9.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2002). Guidelines for fitting and monitoring FM systems. ASHA Desk Reference, 151-171.
3. Boothroyd, A. (1985). Evaluation of speech production in the hearing-impaired: Some benefits of forced-choice testing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 185-196.
4. Boothroyd, A. (1992). The FM wireless link: an invisible microphone cable. In: M. Ross (Ed.), FM Auditory Training Systems. Timonium, MD: York Press.
5. Boothroyd, A., & Nittrouer, S. (1988). Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 101-114.
6. Dillon, H. (2001). Hearing Aids (p. 67). New York: Thieme.
7. Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725-1736.
8. Glasberg, B. R., & Moore, B. C. J. (1989). Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments and their relationships to the ability to understand speech. Scandinavian Audiology, Suppl. 32, 1-25.
9. Mackersie, C. L., Boothroyd, A., & Minnear, D. (2001). Evaluation of the Computer-Assisted Speech Perception Test (CASPA). Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 390-396.
10. Ross, M., Editor (1992). FM Auditory Training Systems. Timonium, MD: York Press.
11. Boothroyd, A., & Guerrero, N. (1996). Normal performance vs. intensity functions for CASPA. Unpublished report, City University of New York.