Regulating the health care workforce: Next steps for research

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages 55-61

  Davies, Celia ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH WORKER;

CONSUMER; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; RESEARCH; STATE MEDICINE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 0842333943     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/135581904322724149     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Klein R. Regulating the medical profession: doctors and the public interest. In: Harrison A, ed. Health care UK 1997/98: the King's Fund annual review of health policy. London: King's Fund, 1998
2. Abelson J. Informing discussion about the professions' future: a review of the professions literature. Prepared for the King's Fund seminar on the future of the professions, 12 September 1996
3. Kennedy Report. The report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. London: The Stationery Office, 2001 (CM 5207(I)) http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/final_report/index.htm
4. Allsop J, Mulcahy L. Regulating medical work: formal and informal controls. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996
5. Walshe K. The rise of regulation in the NHS. BMJ 2002; 324: 967-970
6. Davies C. The demise of professional self-regulation - a moment to mourn? In: Lewis G, Gewirtz S, Clarke J, eds. Rethinking social policy. London: Sage, 2000
7. Davies C. Lay involvement in professional recognition: a study of public appointment-holders in the health field, Milton Keynes: The Open University, 2001
8. Department of Health, The NHS plan, London: Department of Health, 2000. http://www.nhs.uk/nhsplan
9. Irvine D. The doctor's tale: professionalism and public trust. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2003
10. Davies C, Beach A. Interpreting professional self-regulation: a history of the UKCC. London: Routledge, 2000
11. Barrow M. Public services and the theory of regulation. Policy & Politics 1996; 24: 263-276
12. Ashworth R, Boyne GA, Walker RM. Regulatory problems in the public sector: theories and cases. Policy & Politics 2002; 30: 195-211
13. Ayres I, Braithwaite J. Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992
14. Larkin G. Occupational monopoly and modern medicine, London: Tavistock, 1983
15. Witz A. Professions and patriarchy, London: Routledge, 1992
16. Williams S, Sociological imperialism and the profession of medicine revisited: where are we now? Sociology of Health & Illness 2001; 11: 135-160
17. Harrison S, Ahmad WIU. Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology 2000; 34: 129-146
18. Klein R. Complaints against doctors: a study in professional accountability, London: Charles Knight & Co. Ltd, 1973
19. Stacey M. Regulating British medicine: the General Medical Council. Chichester: Wiley, 1992
20. Pyne R. Professional discipline in nursing, midwifery and health visiting. London: Blackwell Science, 1998
21. Bradby H, Gabe J, Bury M. Sexy doctors and busty blondes - press coverage of professional misconduct cases as brought before the GMC. Sociology of Health & Illness 1995; 17: 477-494
22. Allen I. The handling of complaints by the GMC: a study of decision-making and outcomes. London: Policy Studies Institute, 2000
23. Dewar S, Dixon J. Establishing the appropriate standard of proof for GMC hearings into conduct, performance and health: key issues for consideration. London: Kings Fund, 2002
24. Montgomery J. Professional regulation: a gendered phenomenon? In: Sheldon S, Thomson M, eds. Feminist perspectives on health care law. London: Cavendish, 1998
25. Black J. Constitutionalising self-regulation. Modern Law Review 1996; January: 24-55
26. Freidson E. Profession of medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co., 1970
27. Brazier M, Lovecy J, Moran M, Potton M. Falling from a tightrope: doctors and lawyers between the market and the State. Political Studies 1993; 41: 197-213
28. Moran M. Governing the health care state: a comparative study of the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999
29. Salter B. Change in the governance of medicine: the politics of self-regulation. Policy & Politics 1999; 27: 143-158
30. Salter B. Medical regulation: new politics and old power structures. Politics 2002; 22: 59-67
31. Newman J. Modernising governance: new labour, policy and society. London: Sage, 2001
32. Allsop J, Saks M, eds. Regulating the health professions, London: Sage, 2002
33. Davies C. What about the girl next door? Gender and the politics of professional self-regulation, In: Bendelow G, Carpenter M, Vautier C, Williams S, eds. Gender, health and healing: the public/private divide: London: Routledge, 2002
34. Merrison Report. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the regulation of the medical profession: London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1975, Cmnd 6018 (Chairman: Dr A.W. Merrison, FRS)
35. Rafferty AM. The politics of nursing knowledge. London: Routledge, 1996
36. Davies C. Registering a difference: changes in the regulation of nursing. In: Allsop J, Saks M, eds. Regulating the health professions, London: Sage, 2002
37. National Consumer Council. Self-regulation of professionals in health care. London: National Consumer Council, 1999
38. National Consumer Council. Models of self-regulation: an overview of models in business and the professions. London: National Consumer Council, 1999
39. Williams S. Regulating doctors: who protects the patient? Consumer Policy Review 2000; 10: 50-56
40. Hobson E. Nursing a complaint - seeking redress. Consumer Policy Review 2002; 12: 42-48
41. Consumers' Association. Professional self-regulation: a patient-centred approach: a consultation document. London: Consumers' Association, 2000. http://www.which.net
42. Irvine D. Medical regulation - modernisation continues. Consumer Policy Review 2000; 10: 42-49
43. Pyne R. Professional regulation: shaken but not stirred. Consumer Policy Review 2000; 10: 167-173
44. Baeza J. Self-regulation of health professionals: the need for a coherent framework. In: Appleby J, Harrison A, eds. Health care 1999/2000. London: King's Fund, 1999
45. Gladstone D, Johnson J, Pickering WG, Salter B, Stacey M. Regulating doctors. London: Institute for the Study of Civil Society, 2000
46. Rafferty AM. Modernising regulation: can we still trust health professionals? In: Foxwood H, ed. Risk and trust in the NHS. London: The Smith Institute, 2002
47. Johnson MRD, Allsop J, Clark MD, Davies C, Biggerstaff D, Genders N et al. The future health worker: regulation of health care assistants. London: IPPR, 2002
48. Lee-Treweek G, Oerton S. The growth of complementary and alternative medicine: challenges for the future. In Davies C, ed. The future health workforce. London: Palgrave, 2003
49. Dowling S, Martin R, Skidmore P, Doyal L, Cameron A. Nurses taking on doctors work: a confusion of accountability. BMJ 1996; 312: 1211-1214
50. Hogg C, Williamson C. Whose interests do lay people represent? Towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees. Health Expectations 2001; 4: 2-9