Tooth-Supported Telescopic Crown-Retained Dentures: An up to 9-Year Retrospective Clinical Follow-up Study

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-34

  Widbom, Tor ^a   Löfquist, Liselott ^a   Widbom, Christin ^a   Söderfeldt, Björn ^b   Kronström, Mats ^a,b  

^a CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RIGIDITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0842333938     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson C-O. Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: A ten-year longitudinal study. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:506-514.
2. Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson C-O. A 25-year longitudinal study of patients treated with removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:595-599.
3. Carlsson CE, Hedegård B, Koivumaa K. Late results of treatment with partial dentures. An investigation by questionnaire and clinical examination 13 years after treatment. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:267-272.
4. Budtz-Jørgensen E, Isidor F. A 5-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed partial dentures compared with removable partial dentures in a geriatric population. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:42-47.
5. Vermeulen AHBM, Keltjens AM, van't Hof MA, Käyser AF. Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: Survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:267-272.
6. Hulten J, Tillstrom B, Nilner K. Long term clinical evaluation of conical crown retained dentures. Swed Dent J 1993;17:225-234.
7. Ericsson A, Nilsson B, Bergman B. Clinical results in patients with conical crown retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:513-521.
8. Heners M, Walther W. Klinische Bewahrung der Konuskrone als perioprotetisches Konstruktionselement - Eine Langzeitstudie. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1988;43:525-529.
9. Molin M, Bergman B, Ericsson A. A clinical evaluation of conical crown-retained dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:251-256.
10. Igarashi Y, Goto T. Ten-year follow-up study of conical crown retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:149-155.
11. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM. Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: Outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:207-213.
12. Coca I, Lotzmann U, Pöggeler R. Long-term experience with telescopically retained overdentures (double crown technique). Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2000;8:33-37.
13. Minagi S, Natsuaki N, Nishigawa G, Sato T. New telescopic crown design for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:684-688.
14. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partial edentulous arch: The Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-550.
15. Ogata K, Ishii A, Shimizu K, Watanabe N. Longitudinal study on occlusal force distribution in lower distal-extension removable partial dentures with conus crown telescopic system. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:385-392.
16. Akagawa Y, Seo T, Ohkawa S, Tsuru H. A new telescopic crown system using a soldered horizontal pin for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:228-231.
17. Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson C-O. Periodontal and prosthetic conditions in patients treated with removable partial dentures and artificial crowns. A longitudinal two-year study. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29:621-638.
18. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:369-377.
19. California Dental Association. Quality Evaluation for Dental Care. Guidelines for the Assessment of Clinical Quality and Professional Performance. Los Angeles: CDA, 1977.
20. Liebetrau AM. Measures of Associations. Sage University Paper, Series No. 07-032. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
21. Eisenburger M, Tschernitschek H. Klinisch-technischer Vergleich zu Langzeiterfolgen von klammerverankertem Zahnersatz und Teleskop-prothesen. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998;53:257-259.
22. Behr M, Hoffman E, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:87-90.
23. Eisenburger M, Gray G, Tschernitschek H. Long term results of telescopic crown retained dentures - A retrospective study. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2000;8:87-91.
24. Bergman B, Ericson A, Molin M. Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:533-538.
25. Glantz P-O, Ryge G, Jendresen M, Nilner K. Quality of fixed prosthodontics after five years. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:475-479.