How far dare an evaluator go toward saving the world?

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 103-107

  Stake, Bob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0842333773     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ameval.2003.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Fetterman D.M. Empowerment evaluation Evaluation Practice 15 1994 1-15
2. Greene J.C. Qualitative evaluation and scientific citizenship: Reflections and refractions Evaluation 2 1996 277-289
3. House E.R. & Howe K.R. (1999). Values in education and social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Kemmis S. (1986). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
6. MacDonald B. (1977). A political classification of evaluation studies. In D. Hamilton, D. Jenkins, C. King, B. MacDonald, & M. Parlett (Eds.), Beyond the numbers game. London: MacMillan.
7. Patton M.Q. (1996). Utilization-focused evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Shadish W.R. Newman D.L. Scheirer M.A. & Wye C. (Eds.). (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.